legal rqmt for FAX return phone #

Randy Antler randy at pilot.com
Fri May 6 17:29:41 PDT 1994


> Begin forwarded message:
> 

> Date: Fri, 6 May 94 12:38:30 PDT
> From: dat at ebt.com (David Taffs)
> To: cypherpunks at toad.com
> Subject: legal rqmt for FAX return phone #
> Content-Length: 539
> Sender: owner-cypherpunks at toad.com
> Precedence: bulk
> 

> 

> I thought I heard somewhere that it was illegal to send
> anonymous faxes -- namely, that there was some regulation
> that you had to program your FAX machine with your phone
> number so it would get sent automagically whenever you
> faxed anything. Essentially it was ILLEGAL to fax without
> providing the recipient with a mechanism to find out where
> it came from. Of course, I suspect enforcement is lax, but
> still...  :-)  :-(
> 

> Can someone please confirm this, or help with a reference?
> Private e-mail is fine...
> 

> -- 

> dat at ebt.com (David Taffs)

I was _just_ speaking with a few technicians at various FAX management software  
vendors.  A couple of them were saying that identifying the return telephone  
number on incomings FAXes is highly problematic.  There are no established  
standards regarding the format or presentation of the return FAX number  
information.  Also, some older FAX machines may or may not have the feature at  
all.

I wonder, however, because it seems to me that whenever I've received FAXes in  
the past (not exactly commonplace) they have always had the return FAX number  
somewhere at the top of the page.

--
randy at pilot.com (home address)                                  NeXTMAIL
randy at nacm.com (work address)                                   Welcome!
*Out* and _proud_ of it!                      (public key on keyservers)
________________________________________________________________________
"We are here!  We are here!  We are here!"
				-- Horton and the Who
________________________________________________________________________
GCS(GAT): d--(---/-d+) p-@ c+++@ l u++@ e* m+/++ s/+ n+(---) h(--) f* g+
                                                  w++/+++ t++ r(-) y+(*)






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list