RIPEM 1.2

Linn Stanton lstanton at lehman.com
Wed Mar 16 13:45:26 PST 1994


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Allen <consensus at netcom.com> writes:

    Christopher> Now that there is a new version of RIPEM available,
    Christopher> what do you think of it? What do you think is the
    Christopher> value in using it over PGP?

I am glad to see that the 'web of trust' model is spreading. However,
I still see no reason to use ripem.

1) ripem is illegal for non-north-american users
2) ripem still uses DES
3) using ripem supports the notion that PKP holds some valid patents


Linn H. Stanton <stanton at acm.org>

The above opinions are exclusively my own. If anyone else wants them,
they can buy them from me. Easy terms can be arranged.
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.2
 
mQBNAitK8+EAAAECALzK83DH79m7DLKBmZA2h9U33fBE80EwT4xRY05K7WRfxpO3
BmhPVBmes9h97odVZ0RxAFvinOl4wZGOb8pDclMABRG0IUxpbm4gSC4gU3RhbnRv
biA8c3RhbnRvbkBhY20ub3JnPrQnTGlubiBILiBTdGFudG9uIDxsc3RhbnRvbkBz
aGVhcnNvbi5jb20+
=oCru
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQBVAgUBLYd958GRjm/KQ3JTAQGZHgH/X5f3EuTOelU+yhy6rPbTNK+97JOEsETP
MFw9KVf6NLc76nHKxToYla+WNY0em+m5jUKiEPhAj0o6KgP9HZplWA==
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list