"ordinary public"

[bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204]

> rishab at dxm.ernet.in writes:
>  > It's not a good idea to take this debate to the ordinary public...
>  > Time readers, yes...
> 
> Well, if "Time readers" aren't the ordinary public, then I give up.

Well, they're a subset of the ordinary public that both reads and
has some interest in news issues, but that's a reasonably good start.
The folks who only watch TV are a bit different audience,
and the folks who don't care about news are less likely to vote...