low-overhead encrypted telnet
Aggelos D. Keromitis
kermit at ics.forth.gr
Wed Mar 2 09:02:04 PST 1994
In message <9403021619.AA10508 at ah.com>, Eric Hughes writes:
>The reason that encrypted telnet is a good thing is that modification
>at the network level requires kernel modification, and encrypting a
>telnet does not. Installing an encrypted telnet daemon does require
>sysadmin cooperation, but it doesn't mean recompiling the kernel.
>
>As such, encrypted telnet is a good intermediate while the long term
>solution of encrypted IP gets developed and deployed.
>
Has anyone (other than me that is :) thought of changing just the
library routines for setsockopt/getsockopt/send/recv ?
It wouldnt be too hard (me thinks) to do it, but i dont know where to
find the sockets library.
-Aggelos
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggelos Keromitis kermit at csd.uch.gr
Heraclion, Greece kermit at ics.forth.gr
Finger kermit at calliope.ics.forth.gr for public PGP key
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list