low-overhead encrypted telnet

Aggelos D. Keromitis kermit at ics.forth.gr
Wed Mar 2 09:02:04 PST 1994

In message <9403021619.AA10508 at ah.com>, Eric Hughes writes:
>The reason that encrypted telnet is a good thing is that modification
>at the network level requires kernel modification, and encrypting a
>telnet does not.  Installing an encrypted telnet daemon does require
>sysadmin cooperation, but it doesn't mean recompiling the kernel.
>As such, encrypted telnet is a good intermediate while the long term
>solution of encrypted IP gets developed and deployed.
Has anyone (other than me that is :) thought of changing just the
 library routines for setsockopt/getsockopt/send/recv ?
 It wouldnt be too hard (me thinks) to do it, but i dont know where to
 find the sockets library.

 Aggelos Keromitis                                       kermit at csd.uch.gr
 Heraclion, Greece                                       kermit at ics.forth.gr
            Finger kermit at calliope.ics.forth.gr for public PGP key

More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list