clipper and export
Richard Johnson
Richard.Johnson at Colorado.EDU
Fri Jul 22 13:01:47 PDT 1994
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
| Is anyone else distrubed by the way that encryption export policy and the
| clipper chip seem to be linked {in administration policy, and in the
| press?
| ... If we need to prevent encryption export for national security
| reasons, as the administration alleges, then that doesn't neccesarily
| have any relation on whether we need to adopt key escrow too.
>From the beginning, it has been clear to me that the whole thing about
crypto export prohibitions enhancing national security is just a smoke
screen. While there may be a germ of truth to those kinds of statements,
the _real_ reason for propping export controls up when they are no longer
effective, and no longer make sense, is to fragment the worldwide market
and give weakened state-sponsored encryption a window of opportunity to
become a standard.
As such, I'm not upset at how the administration finally is publicly
acknowledging their abuse of export control law for anti-democratic ends.
I'm just upset at their abuse, and consider it highly unethical, even
criminal.
It's ironic that those who are engaging in these unethical, anti-
democratic acts are also asking us to trust them with access to our most
private conversations...
Rich
--
Loudyellnet: Richard Johnson | Sneakernet: ECNT1-6, CB 429, CU Boulder
Phonenet: +1.303.492.0590 | Internet: Richard.Johnson at Colorado.EDU
RIPEM and PGP public keys available by server, finger or request
Speaker to avalanche dragons. Do you really think they listen?
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list