Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Carl Ellison
cme at tis.com
Thu Jul 14 07:50:05 PDT 1994
Previous message:
Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Next message:
Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
have you considered des | tran | des | tran | des ?
Previous message:
Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Next message:
Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list