More on remailers
Matthew J Ghio
mg5n+ at andrew.cmu.edu
Sat Jan 29 15:38:35 PST 1994
I wrote an automated script to ping the following remailers:
hfinney at shell.portal.com
catalyst at netcom.com
elee7h5 at rosebud.ee.uh.edu
nowhere at bsu-cs.bsu.edu
remailer at chaos.bsu.edu
hh at cicada.berkeley.edu
hh at pmantis.berkeley.edu
hh at soda.berkeley.edu
ebrandt at jarthur.claremont.edu
remailer at merde.dis.org
Results were a bit faster with the automated program than before:
Here they are:
Test #1: Sat, 29 Jan 1994 12:52:58 -0500 (EST)
nobody at rosebud.ee.uh.edu 12:53:56 (+0:00:58)
catalyst-remailer at netcom.com 12:53:57 (+0:00:59)
nobody at shell.portal.com 12:53:57 (+0:00:59)
nowhere at bsu-cs.bsu.edu 12:53:59 (+0:01:01)
remailer-admin at chaos.bsu.edu 12:54:06 (+0:01:07)
nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu 12:54:09 (+0:01:11)
nobody at soda.berkeley.edu 12:54:13 (+0:01:15)
nobody at pmantis.berkeley.edu 12:54:16 (+0:01:18)
remailer at dis.org 13:05:35 (+0:12:37)
nobody at eli-remailer 15:32:51 (+2:39:53)
Test #2: Sat, 29 Jan 1994 17:18:36 -0500 (EST)
nobody at rosebud.ee.uh.edu 17:19:04 (+0:00:28)
catalyst-remailer at netcom.com 17:19:06 (+0:00:30)
nobody at shell.portal.com 17:19:07 (+0:00:31)
nowhere at bsu-cs.bsu.edu 17:19:19 (+0:00:43)
remailer-admin at chaos.bsu.edu 17:19:19 (+0:00:43)
nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu 17:19:24 (+0:00:48)
nobody at pmantis.berkeley.edu 17:19:31 (+0:00:55)
nobody at soda.berkeley.edu 17:19:42 (+0:01:06)
remailer at dis.org 17:20:43 (+0:02:07)
nobody at eli-remailer 17:49:23 (+0:30:47)
Results seem to vary depending on current network load and other
factors, but some remailers do seem to be generally faster than others.
I didn't test elee7h5 at rosebud.ee.uh.edu since it always batches its
messages and sends them out at midnite. remail at extropia.wimsey.com only
accepts encrypted mail so I'll have to try that one seperately sometime.
Note: hal at alumni.cco.caltech.edu forwards to hfinney at shell.portal.com
Also, 00x at uclink.berkeley.edu forwards to hh at soda.berkeley.edu
This makes these addresses a little slower, but I guess it helps foil
traffic analysis a bit...
Are there only 12 cypherpunk remailers plus two forwarding addresses?
There were over twenty at one time... Please let me know if I've missed
any.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list