Clipper
Matthew J Ghio
mg5n+ at andrew.cmu.edu
Wed Feb 23 17:57:12 PST 1994
Eli Brandt <ebrandt at jarthur.claremont.edu> wrote:
> Of course they aren't using Clipper, at least not for anything
> sensitive. They know better than that. Clipper is not a secure
> system. Skipjack may be wonderful, but the whole setup
> totally lacks key security. Given their institutional paranoia,
> they wouldn't touch Clipper with a 1024-bit prime.
Skipjack might have a decent design, but considering that it uses 10
byte keys, it will probably be feasible to mount a brute-force attack on
it within a decade or so. (As is currently possible with DES 7-byte
keys.)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list