Detweiler abuse again
Matthew J Ghio
mg5n+ at andrew.cmu.edu
Tue Feb 15 11:09:28 PST 1994
> (As an aside: how do these gateways take the heat? Should I suggest to
> those complaining to me that my system is intended for email, not
> usenet, anonymity, and that they should direct their complaints to the
> mail-to-news gateways which are the "real" cause of the problem?
> Is this tactic likely to be politically effective?)
No, and it would probably backfire. If the mail-to-usenet gateways get
abused, the administrators of the gates will probably start blocking
incoming mail, as CMU and Berkeley have done.
(The CMU gateway is outnews+netnews.group.name at andrew.cmu.edu You can
try it and see what results you get.)
It might be more effective if you bounced messages from detweiler back
to him, CC: postmaster with a notice saying "Due to repeated abuses of
this email service, messages from detweile at cs.colostate.edu are no
longed accepted. Unsent message follows:
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list