DDJ editorial
Michael Handler
grendel at netaxs.com
Sat Dec 24 08:05:15 PST 1994
On Sat, 24 Dec 1994, Harry Bartholomew wrote:
> I think this sentence was missing a NOT:
>
> If, as some claim and RSA disputes, the
> code was reverse-engineered from object files in off-the-shelf software,
> then the law was probably broken - unless RSA and other vendors decide to
> test the strength of highly questionable and likely unenforceable
> shrink-wrap licenses that try to prohibit disassembly/decompilation.
No, that's correct as printed.
--
Michael Handler <grendel at netaxs.com> Philadelphia, PA
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics s.s.y.g-l-b co-moderator
You're only as elegant as your actions let you be
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list