Statistics on remail message sizes
L. Todd Masco
cactus at bb.com
Mon Aug 29 12:48:21 PDT 1994
In article <9408291623.AA29767 at ah.com>, Eric Hughes <hughes at ah.com> wrote:
>Based on Hal's numbers, I would suggest a reasonable quantization for
>message sizes be a short set of geometrically increasing values,
>namely, 1K, 4K, 16K, 64K. In retrospect, this seems like the obvious
>quantization, and not arithmetic progressions. Live and learn.
A brief suggestion: Code the progression, not the four values. As
time goes on (and lossy sendmails disappear), people are sending larger
and larger messages; it's easily conceivable that people could be
swapping multiMB files at some point in the not too distant future
(indeed, I do occasionally send out files that are 4-5 MB large,
uuencoded binaries and tar files).
No point in limiting future behavior due to current usage.
--
L. Todd Masco | "Which part of 'shall not be infringed' didn't
cactus at bb.com | you understand?"
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list