In Search of Genuine DigiCash
Jim Miller
jim at bilbo.suite.com
Tue Aug 16 11:14:43 PDT 1994
> "The proliferation of desktop publishing has brought a
> new growth industry, the counterfeiting of virtually
> undetectable fraudulent checks, and banks and law
> enforcement officials say the cost to the economy could
> reach $1 billion this year.
>
> * * *
>
> The American Banking Association says [this] is the No. 1
> crime problem facing banks.
>
This bring to mind the following question: Is there anything inherent in
NON-anonymous digital cash schemes that make them more vulnerable to
fraud, bribery or inside jobs? (I assume the schemes account for double
spending and "counterfeiting" (however that applies to digicash).)
Can a case be made that anonymous digicash is less risky (to a bank) than
NON-anonymous digicash?
Jim_Miller at suite.com
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list