<null>Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)

[An0nYm0Us UsEr]

Jim Dixon writes:

>Commercial remailers would probably be very concerned with legal
>issues, both criminal (pornography, etc) and non-criminal (copyright
>violations).

Those commercial remailers probably will be located around the world,
so pornography could be send by using an "offshore" [=non-american]
remailer as last link in the chain. 

The jurisdiction where this remailer could be located, preferably 
shouldn't care about pornografy. [Holland, Scandinavia ?]

>--

>Jim Dixon