Cypherpunks as lobbying/propagandizing group

[Eric Hughes]

>>  However, I think we should form a small informal group of people seriously
>>  interested in putting together a well thought out document that is factual
[etc]

>I think this is a very bad idea and not the purpose of the cypherpunks list.

It's a fine idea, except there's no way such a group can claim to
represent cypherpunks at large.

Or, Hey! get you own name.

Eric