Decentralized BBSes

[rishab at dxm.ernet.in]

Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE at delphi.com>:
> There are occasional waves of actions against BBSes. The most recent ones
> are for porn. Before that it was pirate software and phone codes. The next
> one will probably be for "G-files" such as bomb plans - I remember seeing
> a message about this. BBSes and online services are inherently vulnerable
> because there is a responsible person to persecute.

> What we need is a totally decentralized BBS. It would be something like
> running Usenet over UUCP. 

Why not do just that? Many areas of the net transfer mail, and even newsfeeds
through UUCP. ERNet, which I'm connected to in India, had to use UUCP for 
newsfeeds when their connectivity was at 9600 bps, 5 years ago.

UUCP doesn't need phone lines or direct connections; private sites could easily
hitch a ride on the Internet.

Fidonet users have been distributing their message bases worldwide for years.

Oh - there *is* a newsgroup, alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children, which 
would have been shut down if it were a BBS, and presumably cannot be traced to 
individuals. I don't know if anything is ever posted to it, though.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh                            "What is civilisation
rishab at dxm.ernet.in                             but a ribonucleic
Voicemail +91 11 3760335; Vox/Fax/Data 6853410      hangover?"
H-34C Saket New Delhi 110017 INDIA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------