ANON: remail abuse

Christian D. Odhner cdodhner at indirect.com
Wed Jul 21 13:39:44 PDT 1993


> I guess I'm one of those people who would get upset and blame the person
> responsible for the action instead of software and/or technological
> advancement for possible providing a means.

I'm sorry, maybe I didn't make myself clear enough. I also am blameing the
person, not the technology, and I am merely worried about the response
people may use if this becomes more commonplace.

> As Peter mentioned, payphones are already perfect for harrassment.  So
> is junk mail... and the crucial thing here is these services cost money.
> I'm sure future remailers will incorporate digital cash and be a
> pay-for-each-remail service.

I'm sure that would be a big help, although I'm not literate enough yet in
the area of digital cash to understand how this would work.

> Chris also mentions concers about distributing porn and stuff like that
> through remailers.  I guess this could be done, but why give up the

I'm not concerned in particular with porn etc, that just happens to be the
problem in this instance.



> /-----------------------------------\
> | Karl L. Barrus                    |
> | elee9sf at menudo.uh.edu             | <- preferred address
> | barrus at tree.egr.uh.edu (NeXTMail) |
> \-----------------------------------/
> 

Happy Hunting, -Chris Odhner
<cdodhner at indirect.com>






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list