The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)

Paul Baclace peb at PROCASE.COM
Thu Jul 15 11:29:13 PDT 1993



>>   typically a court order, to both key escrow authorities.

>"Typically", of course, means "not always", and it's coupled with the phrase

I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list