header field indicating an anonymous address
Bob Stratton
strat at intercon.com
Sun Feb 28 18:28:35 PST 1993
>>>>> Eric Hughes <hughes at soda.berkeley.edu> writes:
Eric> Marc R. suggests that we standardize on a header field
Eric> to indicate that a message was anonymous.
Eric> I suggest "Anon-Sender:". There's already a "Sender:"
Eric> field in RFC-822, indicating who sent the message, as
Eric> separate from who wrote the message. The "Anon-Sender:"
Eric> field should contain an email address for the maintainer
Eric> of the remailer.
I think that's certainly a viable idea. Of course, the Sender: field
is more honored in the breach than the observance by many mailers.
Another thing to remember is "Errors-To:" which can save a lot of
grief when handling bounces.
Eric> Why? To facilitate complaints. :-)
It would warm my heart to see questions like this come up at IETF
meetings. Keep up the good work.
--Strat
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list