Objections...
Douglas Barnes
wixer!wixer.bga.com!gumby at cactus.org
Tue Apr 20 21:11:35 PDT 1993
Peter Wayner writes:
> I think this is the most practical and non-inflamatory argument
> for public access to the algorithm.
Along the same lines, I am left scratching my head about the
"baroque activities in the vault." Surely this is going to
add substantially to the cost of these chips over a system
that uses a known algorithm and non-escrowed keys.
Given that such a system would be cheaper to produce and would
offer stronger security, I think it is not especially
inflamatory to suggest that the government is contemplating
either an outright ban or the strong discouragement of
alternative systems.
-- Doug Barnes
(gumby at wixer.bga.com)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list