Suggest splitting things up

Eli Brandt ebrandt at jarthur.Claremont.EDU
Wed Dec 2 21:57:33 PST 1992

> From: Peter Shipley <shipley at tfs.COM>

> I suggest to groups be split as suggested  but I will like to add
> that it be donw 

[ a different way ]

Before we consider splitting the list, we should ask whether there are
a significant number of people who would take less than all of the
sublists.  I really don't know.  If the purpose is just to provide a
way to know what "kind" of message you're about to read, we could use
a "tag" the way sci.v-w does, if we find this necessary.  I personally
don't object to this kind of list volume.

> 		-Pete

   Eli   ebrandt at

More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list