[cddlm] Notes from the meeting on 5/31/2006

[Toft, Peter]

Just to let you all know that Steve is on vacation this week, but is
back on Monday. He won't be able to provide you with the files you need
until then.

Congratulations on the excellent progress that you are making.

Regards,
Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)
> Sent: 31 May 2006 14:18
> To: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: [cddlm] Notes from the meeting on 5/31/2006
> 
> Attendees: Satish (NEC), Flavio, Guilherme (UFCG), Dejan (HP)
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> 1. Update:
> 
> UFCG: no significant progress with component model because they
missing
> files from others, from everyone. ACTION item: get files from Satish,
> Steve, and Stuart, so that UFCG can make some progress. (Satish: some
of
> these cases, such as switch and delegate still haven't been
implemented
> in the parser, so right now he does not have these files, will
probably
> work on these this week and send them to Flavio. Others (STUART AND
> STEVE): PLEASE REPLY BY EMAIL WHEN YOU WILL PROVIDE THE FILES). Flavio
> will explicitly request these files. Guilherme testing against the NEC
> endpoint broke again, not sure what is it about. The interval was 2
> minutes. Satish requested to get the sample tests and possibly trace.
> Satish was testing from inside and did not get problems.
> 
> NEC: Wrt UFCG, he did deployment test using CDL that Flavio sent a few
> weeks ago, is trying to reproduce the problems and it is failing but
> still does not understand what it is. The problem is with not being
able
> to deployment components on each other's components. Deployment APIs
are
> 75% on HP endpoint, but not wrt component model. Asked Steve with how
to
> resolve the issue with him not being able to talk to other endpoints,
> but still didn't get response.
> 
> 2. We received feedback on the CDL spec and Jun should take action on
> it. Jun, can you please let us know approximately when you will be
able
> to address the questions raised.
> 
> 3. EVERYONE: PLEASE TRY TO ATTEND NEXT MEETING. WE ARE CLOSE TO OUR
> MILESTONE TO COMPLETE TESTING SO THAT WE CAN START WRITING INFORMAL
> DOCUMENT SUMMARIZING INTEROPERABILITY!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan.