[cddlm] FW: OASIS SDD-TC

[Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)]

Hi,

Attached is the PDF, some people had problems opening it with
OpenOffice.

Thanks,

Dejan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:56 PM
> To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] FW: OASIS SDD-TC
> 
> Thanks Dejan,
> 
> Attached is a draft for SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL discussion.
> I value your feedbacks.
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
> Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> > 
> > Hiro will join us next meeting to discuss the topic 
> addressed in the 
> > email below (SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL). This will be a good 
> opportunity 
> > to ask Hiro about his position wrt interoperability and 
> > standardization, as well as about other topics. BTW Hiro is 
> the member 
> > of the CDDLM mailing list, so you can start any discussion 
> using email.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Dejan.
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:22 PM
> >> To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)
> >> Cc: Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura
> >> Subject: Re: OASIS SDD-TC
> >>
> >> Thanks Dejan,
> >>
> >> I agree with you. Please discuss at your meeting. I can join to 
> >> answer
> > 
> >> any question from your group if you like.
> >>
> >> It is May 3rd Wednesday 6am PDT (= 10pm JST), right?
> >>
> >> Thanks again,
> >> ----
> >> Hiro Kishimoto
> >>
> >> Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote:
> >>> Thanks Hiro,
> >>>
> >>> I personally think that this is a good idea. Please let 
> us discuss 
> >>> this as a team at the next Wednesday meeting and I will 
> get back to 
> >>> you thereafter. Again, personally I think that this is the right 
> >>> approach, but we are used to make decisions as a team and I
> >> prefer to
> >>> do it this way again.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Dejan. 
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 5:39 PM
> >>>> To: Dejan Milojicic; Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura
> >>>> Subject: OASIS SDD-TC
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Dejan, Stuart, and Jun,
> >>>>
> >>>> As you may already heard form Jun, OASIS SDD-TC (they are
> >> working on
> >>>> closely related technology; solution installation) is now
> >> calling for
> >>>> submission.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=sdd
> >>>> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sdd/200604/msg00027.html
> >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17882/oasis-
> >>>> sdd-requirements-v1.1.doc
> >>>>
> >>>> Although their focus is non-grid domain, the last thing I
> >> would see
> >>>> is GGF and OASIS will publish two incompatible deployment
> >> standards
> >>>> and thus impose a unnecessary burden on both end users and
> >> software
> >>>> providers.
> >>>>
> >>>> In order to avoid such worst case scenario, I think GGF should 
> >>>> provide related GGF specifications for SDD-TC and ask them to 
> >>>> consider.
> >>>> It does not mean CDDLM-WG should work with SDD-TC and modify or 
> >>>> update your specs to meet their needs. Instead, just ask 
> SDD-TC to 
> >>>> make their spec compatible with CDDLM and another GGF's specs.
> >>>>
> >>>> The following is the list of GGF's specs we would like to offer;
> >>>>
> >>>> (1) Application Contents Service Specification 1.0
> >>>> (2) CDDLM XML-CDL
> >>>> (3) CDDLM component model
> >>>> (4) Job Submission Description Language 1.0
> >>>>      (SDD-TC also covers required resource description)
> >>>>
> >>>> We exclude CDDLM Deployment API since SDD-TC does not
> >> cover interface
> >>>> specification.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is very important for OGSA and GGF in general to keep
> >> consistent
> >>>> with wider Web service community. For this reason, ACS-WG
> >> and JSDL-WG
> >>>> already agree to the above plan and we would like to hear your 
> >>>> thoughts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> --
> >>>> Hiro Kishimoto
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ggf2sdd-20060502 _2_.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 206894 bytes
Desc: ggf2sdd-20060502 _2_.pdf
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/cddlm-wg/attachments/20060503/99cd20df/attachment.obj