[cddlm] deploy API revisions

Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) dejan.milojicic at hp.com
Tue Mar 28 12:36:14 CST 2006


Thanks Steve,

I will submit it as is (others, please note that PDF does not correspond
to the Word document, read the Word document instead). 

Hiro, I hope that the changes are fine with you and that it is ok that I
submit it.

Thanks,

Dejan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Steve Loughran
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:24 AM
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] deploy API revisions
> 
> 
> This is the updated document. As usual, the CVS image of this 
> is the normative copy of the specification; what you are 
> seeing here is are downstream artifacts of that gold image.
> 
> I've made less changes than hiro suggested, not because I 
> dont agree with them, but because I dont think the changes 
> should go through except in co-ordination with the other 
> specifications. If we can do this, then yes, I am in favour 
> of the changes.
> 
> A1, A2. Yes, there is duplication in the introductory commentary. 
> However, the team agreed to put a consistent preamble across 
> all the standards. I do not want to change mine to be 
> inconsistent, unless we change all simulataneously. 
> Accordingly, I have not applied any changes to that part of 
> the document.
> 
> A2:
> Looking at the engineering costs of this I'm more reluctant 
> to make an immediate change. I'd have to change the schema 
> information across all docs including test documents, and it 
> will be inconsistency across the different specs. We can do 
> it, but it will require team-wide coordination.
> 
> An extra complexity is that GFD.58 doesnt define where other 
> URIs should go, for example, MUWS capabilities. I have picked 
> on 
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02/capabilities/
> portal for one of these. Similarly, Appendix B defines two
> 
> What I have done is declared in section 4.4.3.3 that all 
> extra deployment options that begin with 
> http://ggf.org/schemas/cddlm are reserved for the cddlm wg.
> 
> 
> A3. Declared which chapters are normative vs informative.
> 
> A5:. removed "Compliant" near OGSA.
> 
> A6: marked the XSD as copyright 2004-2006. It didnt exist until 2004.
> 
> 
> Again, these are all minor changes. They make no changes to 
> the semantics of any part of the specification.
> 
> Dejan, Stuart, if you are happy with these, then post them to 
> the site. 
> I am now going to be absent for eight days, skiing in the 
> Alps. No email, no voicemail.
> 
> -steve
> 
> -Steve
> 





More information about the cddlm-wg mailing list