[cddlm] RE: Notes from the meeting on 3/15/2006

[Stuart Schaefer]

Dejan,

Is that necessary?  I think we can remind the team during this evening's
OGSA call.

The UML was generic, not for deploying blast.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:07 AM
To: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
Subject: [cddlm] RE: Notes from the meeting on 3/15/2006

Hi,

Sorry, I gorgot one more action item:

5. Stuart will post a reminder to the OGSA mailing list that he alerady
did a UML diagram for deploying BLAST and provide a URL for the posted
document.

Thanks,

Dejan.

> Action items:
> 
> 1. Steve Loughran edited Steve Newhouse's document (there may 
> be a few more additions needed to address CDL server name, 
> and other strengths of the CDDLM server, such as loose 
> coupling - we have an independent CDDLM server with the 
> deployment APIs, etc.). Jun will edit next, and then Stuart. 
> Ayla and UFCG team, you are also welcome to contribute. I 
> will take last turn. Once we have it done, we will pass it 
> back by Steve and OGSA.
> 
> 2. Stuart will schedule a meeting next week to go over 
> importing CDL spaces.
> 
> 3. Steve will post a summary paragraph on changes to the 
> Deployment API specs, so that Dejan can resubmit the document.
> 
> 4. Dejan will post a summary reply to Hiro's presentation by 
> attendees and team will follow-up so that we can post reply 
> before the meeting today.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan.