[cddlm] RE: Next CDDLM and OGSA joint call (July 10)

[Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs)]

Hi Hiro,

I will be on vacation next week (and the following two) and will not be
able to attend the meeting. I expect that Jun will attend, but I can not
confirm this.  I will try to review the documents you have provided, but
there is a high likelihood that I will nto be able to because of the
other many commitments I have just prior to vacation.

Jun, can you please confirm if you will attend the meeting and whether
you will provide any feedback.

Thanks,

Dejan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 12:00 AM
> To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs); Jun Tatemura; 'cddlm-wg at ggf.org'
> Subject: Next CDDLM and OGSA joint call (July 10)
> 
> Hi Dejan and Jun,
> 
> We hope to have next CDDLM and OGSA joint call on July 10 
> (3-5pm PT) and we really need your feedback and attendance.
> 
> You can find the latest materials from gridForge
> 
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13640?nav=1
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13637?nav=1
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13638?nav=1
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13639?nav=1
> 
> Dejan and Jun: Can check the above CDL documents before the call?
> 
> > * CDL documents review
> > 
> >   Hiro produced and sent out new versions of the CDL 
> documents. A few
> >   remaining issues were discussed.
> > 
> >   - Location of application binary (to deploy from) and 
> format. Agreed
> >     that in general the client would not know these (but may know
> >     under certain circumstances). So in general
> >     - deployer (or perhaps developer) produces (original) CDL
> >     - Client produces jsdl
> >     - And a repository or some other internal component 
> keeps track of
> >       binaries and related information
> >   - Permission and Owner of files.
> >     - The binary does not have to be owned by the user running the
> >       job; user just needs to be able to execute.
> >       - Simplest case assume that the correct permissions/ownership
> >         are set in the archive
> >       - If the desire is to show it as an example in the 
> CDL something
> >         like "root.bin 755" or perhaps "blast.blast 755" or 555 is
> >         appropriate.
> >       - These are also affected by system policy.
> >   - pre-script 
> >     - Hiro has talked with Chris Smith and they have removed the
> >       pre-script.
> >     - Assume instead that the db is pre-formatted (perhaps by an
> >       earlier user job) and that it can be made available by
> >       requesting a specific filesystem be made available on 
> the host.
> >     - Hiro added 'database' filesystem.
> > 
> >   ACTION: Hiro to ask Jun and Dejan to check the CDL documents
> >   ACTION: Hiro to also make any relevant updates to the 
> Scenarios text
> >   ACTION: Jun/Hiro to also prepare the post-deployment BLAST CDL
> >           document
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
>