[cddlm] CDL Tests

[Guilherme Mauro Germoglio Barbosa / Projeto Ourgrid - Projeto Ourgrid/LSD]

I think this discussion should be resumed. Jun, what is your position?

Steve Loughran wrote:

> Guilherme M. G. Barbosa / Grad. DSC wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Steve Loughran wrote:
>>
>>> Guilherme Germoglio wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Our test results regarding the cdl parser can be viewed in: 
>>>> http://lsd.ufcg.edu.br/~guiga/cddlm/test_results/index.html
>>>>
>>>>  From these tests we have changed test cddlm-cdl-2005-09-0005, from 
>>>> import_namespace set because its resolution expected is not correct.
>>>>
>>>> The expected must be the following:
>>>>
>>>>   <cdl:system xmlns:test1="http://cddlm.org/test1.cdl"
>>>>             xmlns:t2="http://cddlm.org/test2.cdl">
>>>>           <MyServer>
>>>>             <hostname>www.cddlm.org <http://www.cddlm.org></hostname>
>>>>             <port>80</port>
>>>>           </MyServer>
>>>>   </cdl:system>
>>>>
>>>> As hostname property was redefined to www.cddlm.org 
>>>> <http://www.cddlm.org> in MyServer , which extends test1:WebServer, 
>>>> this property cannot be the same of test1:WebServer (data/hostname).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> you are right. fixed.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you can see in the results, 2 required tests remained failing: 
>>>> cddlm-cdl-2005-02-0021 and cddlm-cdl-06-0001
>>>> They regard the resolution of references to lazy properties. We 
>>>> think the tests are not according to the specification, that says 
>>>> in sections 7.3.3 and 7.5.2, respectively:
>>>>
>>>> "A value reference at /n/ referring to /n'/ is resolvable if and 
>>>> only if:
>>>>            (...)
>>>>
>>>>     *
>>>>
>>>>       The node /n'/ and its descendants do not have any @cdl:ref and
>>>>       @cdl:lazy attribute. Otherwise, the resolution is deferred until
>>>>       these @cdl:ref and @cdl:lazy attributes are resolved."
>>>>
>>>>  "A reference to an property with a @cdl:lazy attribute MUST NOT be 
>>>> resolved before the @cdl:lazy attribute is resolved."
>>>>
>>>> What does the specification mean by "be resolved"? When it states 
>>>> that the reference MUST NOT be resolved, does it mean that the 
>>>> reference must remain unchanged? If so, the tests must be changed. 
>>>> If not, what is the expected behavior?
>>>>
>>>
>>> the cddlm-cdl-2005-02-0021 actually tests that the presence of a 
>>> cdl:lazy attribute is harmless if you have no reference, it just 
>>> gets kept along. There's no reason for it not to be dropped, except 
>>> that the specification explicitly says that only cdl:ref and 
>>> cdl:refroot attributes get stripped when copying references.
>>>
>>
>> But according to the specification (section 7.3.3), if a descendant 
>> of a node refered has the cdl:lazy attribute (just like 
>> cddlm-cdl-2005-02-0021), this reference resolution must be deferred 
>> until the resolution of this cdl:lazy.
>
>
> Except a node <something cdl:lazy="true" >value</something> isnt 
> actually a resolvable reference. it is inherently resolved to a node 
> which has the the text "value", and the cdl:lazy attribute.
>
> Jun, what do you think?>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3253 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/cddlm-wg/attachments/20060410/0059f8ce/attachment.bin