[cddlm] Survey for OGSA-WG F2F meeting back-to-back GGF15

[Milojicic, Dejan S]

Steve and the team,

Please fill out the survey below. Hiro is very good in doing these
things, shortly he will post the outcome of the survey and we'll all
know in an obvious way who will attend what and when. I already filled
out the survey. However, FYI I will be leaving on Thursday afternoon. I
plan to attend the OGSA/CDDLM session on Thursday rather than GGF.

Thanks,

Dejan.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Steve Loughran
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 9:22 AM
> To: 'cddlm-wg at ggf.org'
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] Survey for OGSA-WG F2F meeting back-to-back GGF15
> 
> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> > Hi all, and sorry for the cross-posting again.
> > 
> > As you already know, OGSA-WG and fellow WGs are planning to 
> have F2F 
> > meeting in Boston, back-to-back with GGF15. The meeting 
> will be held 
> > on Thursday (9am-6pm) and Friday (8am-3:30pm) at IBM office 
> in Boston 
> > (it is 2.2 miles away from GGF15 venue instead of walking distance).
> > 
> > Please keep it in mind that this F2F is workshop style technical 
> > discussion. If you want to learn OGSA activities in general, "OGSA 
> > Status and direction presentation session" on Oct. 3 (Mon) 
> > 11am-12:30pm at Berkely/Clarendon room is the one you should join.
> > 
> > In order to obtain admission to the F2F venue, please let 
> us know your 
> > plan for attendance by answering the following on-line survey. 
> > Deadline is EoB Friday (Sept. 23).
> > 
> > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB224MNGGSZFW
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> I thought by not booking my flights till last weekend I was 
> cutting it fairly fine, but no, we now have an extra two days 
> at the end.
> 
> I'm going to say yes to thursday, but as my flight out of 
> boston is at 17.00 hours or thereabouts, I wont be able to 
> spend much time in the afternoon sessions.
> 
> who else can make it. Stuart? You at least have no 
> transatlantic return flights to deal with?
> 
> -steve
> 
>