[cddlm] CDL Testcase Presentation

[Steve Loughran]

Stuart Schaefer wrote:
> I did not receive Jun's document in my email, so I apologize for not
> having read it before our meeting.  Here are my thoughts as discussed at
> today's meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> 1)       Use the RDF approach.  CDL test documents should be specified
> as pairs.  Pre and post parsing.  Each of our DOM/XOM engines can spit
> out the final results of parsing as a CDL.
> 
> 2)       I don't think it is worth the time to create an automated
> "equivalence" tester for comparing the CDL provided in the test case
> output with the output of our own parser.  We should be able to spot
> check results for compliance easily enough.  Just my opinion.  Document
> equivalence is more of an XML problem than a CDL one.

Also, xmlUnit http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net/

has both java and .net implementations.