[cddlm] Meeting tomorrow, 11/3, 6am PST

[Milojicic, Dejan S]

Hi,

My homework from the last meeting was to talk to Hiro about
interoperability. I have done so and Hiro asked me to discuss this with
Cees, whom I communicated with by email (see my earlier email today).
I'll continue this investigation further with people who have pursued
interoperability within IETF in the past.

I also discussed with Hiro how we can continue our engagement with OGSA.
We are scheduled to be on the OGSA call next Wednesday, 11/9. We will
address the homework we had received while at F2F after GGF, and which
we have addressed at the first meeting after GGF.

The assignment for the meeting tomorrow was for everyone to think of the
dependencies they may have from others so that we can start tracking
progress we are making towards reference implementations. I would like
to start tracking using GridForge trackers.

Please use our usual phone numbers:

+1 866-639-4732 (toll free while in US)   
Code  2362906 (followed by a '#' sign)   
+1 574-948-0379 (toll & international)

Thanks,

Dejan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milojicic, Dejan S 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:49 AM
> To: 'cddlm-wg at ggf.org'
> Subject: Notes from the meeting
> 
> Attendees: Stuart, Steve, Ayla, Dejan.
> 
> Notes taker Dejan.
> 
> We discussed how to demonstrate that something constitutes a 
> reference implementation. We suggested the following steps:
> 
> 1. Individual components tests (every owner will contribute one).
> 
> 2. Use cases:
>    
>    a) Single app
> 
>    b) Multi-tier, one machine
>   
>    c) Multi-tier, multi-machine
> 
> 3. Optional: Grid computing apps (Blast, Globus)
> 
> 4. Optional: Scale experiments
> 
> Steve suggested that he will write a draft of the test 
> components by next week, a more complete suggestion in two weeks.
> 
> Everyone will write a dependency list that they have on other 
> components so that we create a roadmap from now until next 
> GGF. One good example of dependencies is component tests that 
> should be available as early as possible so that reference 
> implementations can test their compatibility. We do not want 
> to track detailed plan of individual reference 
> implementations although we want to have some sense of the 
> overall progress we are making and whether we shall have 
> reference implementations completed for the next GGF.
> 
> Dejan will talk to Hiro today to find out about the proofs 
> for interoperability and compatibility (if any).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan.