[cddlm] namespaces

[Milojicic, Dejan S]

Hi Steve,

Please flag it as an open issue that we need to address on the ongoing
bases until completely resolved. I believe that we can still change the
CDL in the spec, if needed.

Thanks,

Dejan.

PS BTW Below I do not see the difference in the last two namespaces you
provide. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Steve Loughran
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 6:04 AM
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] namespaces
> 
> 
> I am moving to the following namespaces
> 
> 
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/events/2005/02/
> 
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/events/2005/02
> http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/wsdl/2005/02
> 
> The only one I am unsure about is the CDL namespace. On the 
> most recent copy of the CDL spec that I have to hand, the URL is
> 
> http://www.girdforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0
> 
> This is from the document; I assume that it is a typo and 
> that it should be
> 
> http://www.gridforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0
> 
> Even, then, it is different from Stuart's proposed scheme, 
> but if the CDL is already submitted, we have to flow with it. 
> I would note that would be good if at some point in the 
> future we could actually host the XSD at the various 
> locations, even though there is no requirement to do so -a 
> lot of XML parsers expect to fetch XSD from the (resolved) URI
> 
> Dejan, can I flag up namespace consistency as an issue, 
> something we need to address as a group to avoid shipping 
> inconsistent documents.
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>