[cddlm] Notes of the meeting on 8/3/2005

Milojicic, Dejan S dejan.milojicic at hp.com
Fri Aug 5 09:33:53 CDT 2005


Hi Ayla,

Thanks for the update. I think that this is a good approach!

Thanks,

Dejan. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg at ggf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:42 AM
> To: Milojicic, Dejan S
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] Notes of the meeting on 8/3/2005
> 
> Hi Dejan and all,
> 
> we have analyzed the problems with Tomcat and we've concluded 
> that in fact our tests were stressing it, because we had at 
> about 30 deployments and undeployments of 11MB each, one 
> after the other in a set of 94 tests. We've reduced each 
> component size verifying common libs from Muse that could be 
> removed from each deployed component and it worked. Maybe the 
> same problem can happen with Jetty, but we had a meeting 
> yesterday and concluded that a lot of code, including unit 
> tests would need to be rewritten and we would not be able to 
> have a prototype at the end of this month if we make this 
> change. Maybe in a future version we can use Jetty.
> 
>  In relation to the update of properties, it is working well 
> using Muse, we are just implementing more JUnit tests that 
> verify the integration of the CDL parser with the module that 
> deals with the update of properties in components. We hope to 
> have the first prototype by the end of the month, but we fear 
> not to have enough time to assure that  all the tests from 
> the Test Plan sent by Steve are passing, because we are 
> suposing Muse will actually provide some of the functionality 
> that is demanded there and won't give us problems difficult 
> to find as the ones we had when the specification needed adjustments.
> 
>   Ayla
> 
> 
> 
> Milojicic, Dejan S wrote:
> 
> >Attendees: Steve, Ayla, Dejan.
> >
> >1. Update on the progress with reference implementations
> >
> >Ayla: did a parser and service, but Tomcat dies after sequential 
> >deployments. Working in parallel to finish service, have 
> prototype of 
> >the portal of the system, but only using the properties of Muse it 
> >works. There are some problems with updating properties. They are 
> >implementing more tests. Still confident that the first 
> prototype will 
> >be done by end off August. Steve suggested using Jetty instead of 
> >Tomcat.
> >
> >Steve: Hasn't done much since GGF because of other commitments. Has 
> >completed requirements document and put into the CVS.
> >
> >No information from Jun and Stuart. Hopefully they will join in next 
> >week.
> >
> >2. Preparation for the meeting with OGSA
> >
> >Steve will join (potential
> >
> >3. Defining agenda for the F2F with OGSA (I need to provide 
> it to Hiro
> >shortly)
> >
> >A) Introduction (learn more about EMS broader picture, in 
> the past wee 
> >overviewed CDDLM)
> >B) Defining architectural relationship
> >C) Indebt overview of the CDDLM interfaces (if needed)
> >D) Integration roadmap
> >E) Next steps
> >
> >4. Planning next activities
> >
> >Meeting are back on the weekly basis. 
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Dejan.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 





More information about the cddlm-wg mailing list