[Capi-bof] Charter - last call for changes

[Michael Richardson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Johnston <samj at samj.net> writes:
    Sam> Aside from that the "network tag" suggestion I made before
    Sam> would allow for the creation of private networks (two
    Sam> interfaces with the same tag would obviously be wired together)
    Sam> but assigning meaning to those tags (subnet details, etc.) 
    Sam> would be left to the fabric. The vast majority of workloads
    Sam> don't care, so long as they can talk to each other and their
    Sam> clients (assuming they have any which is not always the case).

  My kinds of deployments I need to do require multiple network
interfaces per VM for security and performance reasons.
  Typically that means 4 networks, with one of those being the Internet.

  An API that does not permit me to do describe this would not be useful
to me.  I do not believe that this is a a difficult thing to accomplish,
and I understand it to be in scope of the proposed charter.

- -- 
]     Y'avait une poule de jammé dans l'muffler!!!!!!!!!        |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQEVAwUBScovOICLcPvd0N1lAQJCJggAglC8uwBDZaGUhEvOkBblEKHwCusW7tiz
S3G37Y8AT18DpSY6PEFkKDRJGHZLgI1TaH6LFHQ1u0L1H+4CG9miiMrxEcN1MNfn
SqUwmWD+zIm6XIXr3NjCsKm6KrTac+JfdfjWpYBNregcGHoHqknwWi1T+cmgMMbH
+YPgpwnoq7GvdssDjrqVm5ZlHtXkoPoC7H8tYOfSOgMrqRHEo1+XbXA6pdZH7L5+
7rTqfYI7Vf2PxeNJF//Lbd2IiqpjPNlDqkCxQIz5t+GgM/hhseb9Uc17/o4JmpTb
FVfSJor838BfwYogZi+qKjSjLXHIk77M/BqkDZ6s8sUiO/Voh20YgQ==
=V3/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----