[caops-wg] Relying Party Defined Namespace Constraints: document in public comment

[David Groep]

Dear all,

The long-awaited "RPDNC" document, giving the rationale behind the
current practice of signing_policy or namespaces files, as well as a
review of the requirements and use cases for any possible successor
to the current formats, is now available for public comment:

  http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/comment.php?id=298

Please take time to make comments on this document, even just a "Yes, I
like this document and now I really understand for the first time why
I wrote these ...".

Circulate widely and also get non-experts (in particular Relying Parties
of course!) to read is and make sure it's understandable.

	Regards,
	DavidG.

-- 
David Groep

** Nikhef, Dutch National Institute for Sub-atomic Physics,PDP/Grid group **
** Room: H1.56 Phone: +31 20 5922179, PObox 41882, NL-1009DB Amsterdam NL **