[cads] Re: update on GGF17

[Craig Lee]

I don't want to run roughshod over process completely, but why don't
you get started pronto while the paperwork catches up with you.
The charter is in the Approve New Group tracker and we're scheduled
to approve (oops, discuss) it tomorrow followed by the 7d conditional
approval period.  I think it fits in the RG model just fine and has clear
goals and critical mass.  Are the two group sessions enough?

--Craig

P.S.  The four major topics could be called out in bullets or enumerated
to make them pop out at the reader.

P.P.S.  It's an RG (not WG). ;->


At 07:48 AM 4/3/2006, Catlett Charlie wrote:
>Is GIN a working group now?  I missed the notification, but was
>curious as to the status of our proposed charter.  Maybe the GFSG is
>waiting for me as relevant AD to push for resolution?
>CeC
>
>On Apr 1, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Dennis Gannon wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>i resolved this problem.  GIN is now a working group and they
>>submitted
>>their proposal as two working group session reqeuests.  i asked
>>them if
>>this is what they intended and they said yes.
>>dennis
>>
>>On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Satoshi Matsuoka wrote:
>>
>>>The GIN proposal still seems to be missing. I will submit a
>>>placeholder
>>>in the meantime while I try to see if I could contact Charlie, but
>>>probably difficult since he is crusing off the coast of Central
>>>America
>>>somewhere.
>>>
>>>                                                         Satoshi (M)
>>>On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:54:29 -0500 (EST)
>>>Dennis Gannon <gannon at cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>gannon> hi all,
>>>gannon> i have not had much response on the proposed program.  i need
>>>gannon> to get it finalized this weekend.  I am not available
>>>today to
>>>gannon> work on this, but if you can look at the program.  see if
>>>there
>>>gannon> are problems and let me know.  also, ann, can you arrange
>>>to have
>>>gannon> the proposals that were submitted put into a document and
>>>sent
>>>gannon> to the groups on this list?
>>>gannon> thanks
>>>gannon> dennis
>>>gannon>
>>>gannon> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Dennis Gannon wrote:
>>>gannon>
>>>gannon> > hi folks,
>>>gannon> > as of friday we recieved 15 requests for community
>>>presentations/panels.
>>>gannon> > By doing a bit of compression (what i am talking about
>>>is to take some
>>>gannon> > suggested talks on related subjects and give them 40
>>>min. each and put
>>>gannon> > them in the same 90 min. slot)  we can accomodate all of
>>>them.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > things still to do:
>>>gannon> > 1.  complete the planning for the "big grids" panel on
>>>weds.  that should
>>>gannon> > be an update on teragrid, OSG, NAREGI, and others in the
>>>region.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > 2.  plan the "OGSA & Alternatives" panel.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > 3.  complete the planning for the Big Data panel on thurs.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > 4,  contact craig lee to see if he is still interested
>>>in doing the vendor
>>>gannon> > adoption forum.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > also note: i have not scheduled anything submitted
>>>though the general
>>>gannon> > working group/research group track.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > and finally, there is a reason i do not show up on the
>>>community calls at
>>>gannon> > 10:00 central.  they overlap with my teaching duties
>>>this semester.
>>>gannon> > i will try to be there this morning, but i cannot
>>>promise i will be there
>>>gannon> > for very long.
>>>gannon> >
>>>gannon> > dennis
>>>
>>>Satoshi Matsuoka,  Professor
>>>Global Scientific Information and Computing Center
>>>  & Dept. of Mathematical and Computing Sciences
>>>Tokyo Institute of Technology
>>>Address: 2-12-1 Oo-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552 Japan
>>>Tel&fax: +81-3-5734-3876   E-mail: matsu at acm.org,
>>>matsu at is.titech.ac.jp
>>>