[BYTEIO-WG] ByteIO interop

[Mark Morgan]

I can no longer find any such text either.  Maybe I'm simply remembering
incorrectly.  Without such a document, I can't say for sure why that
requirement was put into the interop document.  Could be simply to
simplify the interop process -- after all, the point wasn't to test the
interoperability of SOAP, but only ByteIO which is an orthogonal
concern.

-Mark

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 14:52 +0100, Mario Antonioletti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > My understanding, which may be flawed, or out of date, or both, is that
> > this was the defacto standard adopted by OGF, and if not by OGF, then
> > certainly by the OGSA WSRF-BP; the rendering used by the Byte IO
> > interop.
> 
> I had a brief scan through the WSRF BP 1.0:
> 
> http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.72.pdf
> 
> but could not find any preference specified for the document/literal 
> or rpc/literal styles. If OGF is recommending one style over the other
> it would be good to know what the reference for this is.
> 
> Thanks Mark,
> 
> Mario
> 
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Mario Antonioletti:EPCC,JCMB,The King's Buildings,Edinburgh EH9 3JZ.   |
> |Tel:0131 650 5141|mario at epcc.ed.ac.uk|http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~mario/ |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+