[BYTEIO-WG] ByteIO interop

[Mark Morgan]

My understanding, which may be flawed, or out of date, or both, is that
this was the defacto standard adopted by OGF, and if not by OGF, then
certainly by the OGSA WSRF-BP; the rendering used by the Byte IO
interop.

-Mark

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 12:54 +0100, Mario Antonioletti wrote:
> Hi,
>     We have been thinking about (finally) doing interop in the DAIS WG 
> and I was looking through the ByteIO interop document and near the 
> beginning there is a statement:
> 
> ByteIO implementations that wish to participate in interoperability 
> tests MUST use the following binding:
> o	The Port Type MUST be bound to SOAP 1.1
> o	The binding MUST use the "document/literal" style.
> 
> In DAIS we have already hit the document/literal vs rpc/literal SOAP 
> binding. I was wondering whether there was a rationale for having 
> adopted document/literal rather than rpc/literal for the binding? or
> was this a quick and easy decision to get the interop testing 
> underway?
> 
> Please let me/us know. Thanks in advance,
> 
> Mario
> 
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Mario Antonioletti:EPCC,JCMB,The King's Buildings,Edinburgh EH9 3JZ.   |
> |Tel:0131 650 5141|mario at epcc.ed.ac.uk|http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~mario/ |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+