[ACS-WG] [acs-wg] Service Modeling Language (SML)

[Pete Ziu]

Yes, I am interested, that's great!  I may have to attend remotely,  
will there be a dial-in available?

Pete


On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Keisuke Fukui wrote:

> Hi Pete,
>
> Glad to hear from you! How's it going?
>
> Yes SML is interesting. It may have influence on every XML based Grid
> technology, but I wouldn't say it is parallel to the specific  
> deployment
> specifications.
>
>
> BTW, there will be a presentation from NAREGI PSE at OGF19 ACS  
> session.
> I hear it will include their first implementation of ACS repository
> replication. Are you interested in it?
>
>  -Keisuke
>
>
> Pete Ziu wrote:
>> Hi folks, sorry for the long absence.  Very interesting.  So we  
>> now have three of these in the mix with varying scopes?  (SDD-TC,  
>> CDDLM, and SML).
>> Pete.
>> On Jan 15, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Keisuke Fukui wrote:
>>> I think the schematron may be another missing link in XML world  
>>> since after
>>> emergence of the XML Schema, and the SML can be a successful  
>>> practice
>>> of it. The problem is that I am a bit behind the band:-p
>>> I will appreciate it if you fill in your idea occasionally.
>>>
>>>   -Keisuke
>>>
>>> Michael Behrens wrote:
>>>> I agree that it is a step ahead.  ACS could manage an SML XML  
>>>> document
>>>> descriptor as well. :)
>>>> SML seems to me at first glance to weave together management and
>>>> deployment/provisioning and potentially more.  If a "complete"  
>>>> model is
>>>> rendered, then the model could be used to drive everything from
>>>> determining where to best provision something (based on the use of
>>>> constraints), and then know how to manage the system and  
>>>> dependencies.
>>>> Maybe I'm reading too much into it for now - I'll need to study  
>>>> it more
>>>> and try to figure out all the places where it can be applied.   
>>>> It will
>>>> be interesting to see their scenarios.
>>>> There is also a mention of a database to store and distribute  
>>>> models
>>>> using the SML-IF potentially - a familiar pattern.
>>>>
>>>> Keisuke Fukui wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Mike!
>>>>>
>>>>> This sounds like a step ahead practice than today's framework.  
>>>>> It may
>>>>> help us to do things more clearly. What is your idea on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>  -Keisuke
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Behrens wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>   acs-wg mailing list
>>>   acs-wg at ogf.org
>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/acs-wg
>
>