[acs-wg] Teleconference minutes - Oct 26

[Sachiko Wada]

Hi team,

Here is the minutes of the last teleconf.
Please review it and point out where the record is not correct, if any.

I'll upload the minutes to Gridforge later, since I can not access the 
page now. 

Sachiko

-------------- next part --------------
=======================================================================
ACS Teleconference 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date and Time: Oct 26 20:05-21:40 EDT 2005 / Oct 27 9:05-10:40 JST, 2005
Participants:
  Keisuke Fukui (Fujitsu)
  Peter Ziu (Northrop)
  Michael Behrens (R2AD)
  Sachiko Wada (ASCADE) - minutes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Review of the new Chapters for Samples, Schemas, Open Issues and Authors.
** Title
  Keisuke proposed to use revision # to represent modification instead of 
  changing version like 0.5x. The title of the draft will be 
  "Application Contents Service Specification 1.0 Revision 0".
** Samples
  - Change example URL from "foo.example.com" to "foo.ggf.org".
    (Done on Oct 31)
  - Mike's question: why use ARI rather than QName to specify attributes 
    such as transport method or transport type.
    Answer: Both are legal as XML Schema, but URI sounds more extensible
    so that third parties can add their own transport method or type.
  - Pete's question: Is the directory structure of the AA 
    depicted in the samples, such as data, app, etc., normative?
    Answer: No. Only the file name of AAD (aad.xml) is normative.
  - It should be explicitly explained that the example 5 is the case using
    the extensibility of the transport method.
** Schemas
  - Pete proposed to include schemas for Deployment Descriptor within ACS
    namespace. 
    Conclusion: The schema for DD and its URI would be defined by the other
    specifications than ACS. If it is done so, it can be presented as a value
    for the type attribute of the Content element, described in Section 6.1
 Action: All, to review the draft and make comments.

* Review of the remained comments through the document. 
  No comments left at present.

* Review of the "Issues in Spec" tracker items.
   We could not review the "Issues in Spec" during the meeting due to 
   time restriction.
  Action: All, to review the "Issue in Spec" as shown in below link 
   and make comments.
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=147&atid=805&filter=&f_artifact_id=&f_priority=&f_assigned_to=&f_artifact_status=&f_category=&f_artifact_group=&group_id=147&atid=805&sort0=priority&dir0=

* Schedule toward the submission of the draft
   We had planned to submit to the GGF editor on Oct 31, but
   it can be pushed by a week or so, if it requires time to review the draft.
   (NOTE: Submission date has pushed to Nov 7, see Keisuke's mail on Oct 31)
   [Projection]
    Mid Nov. Comments from GGF editor received.
    End Nov. Comments are addressed and returned.
    Early Dec. 60 day public review starts.
    Early Feb. review comments are collected.
    Mid Feb.   updated draft is returned to GGF editor.
    End Feb.   approval by GGF.

* Updates
   OASIS SDD TC F2F will be held during Nov. 14-16.
   Keisuke will attend the meeting.

* Next meeting
   Date & Time: Nov 9 Wed 19:00 EST/Nov 10 Thu 9:00 JST
   Calling #: will be announced later
   Note: Nov 2nd and 16th will be skipped.