[acs-wg] GGF13 minutes
Sachiko Wada
sachiko at ascade.co.jp
Tue Mar 29 22:08:43 CST 2005
Folks,
Here are the minutes of the ACS sessions at GGF13.
Please review them and address your comments/observations, if any.
I apologize for the late post.
They are also available at Gridforge:
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/minutes_session-1/en/1
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/minutes_session-2/en/1
Regards,
Sachiko Wada
-------------- next part --------------
GGF13 Application Contents Service (ACS) session #1
Date and Time: Mar. 14, 2005, 13:00 - 14:30
Place: Lotte Hotel Emerald Room 3
Lead: Keisuke Fukui (Fujitsu)
Notes: Sachiko Wada (Ascade)
** Agenda
- Opening salutation
Introduction & note takers
Agenda Bashing
- "ACS introduction" by Keisuke Fukui of Fujitsu
- Use cases and visions
"NAREGI PSE and ACS" by Prof. Kawata of Utsunomiya university in Japan
"Enterprise Grid Appliance Operating Environment" by Peter Ziu of Northrop
"Business Grid Project" by Keisuke Fukui of Fujitsu
** Summary
The session attracted about 30 people and succeeded to present the overall information to new comers to the session and share the current status of the WG, leaving the presentation about IUDD specification and the detailed planning to the next session.
** ACS overview
Current status and history at GGF is presented by Keisuke. Below is questions and answers for the presentation.
Q. What will and will not be defined in ACS?
A. We will define archive format and repository architecture.
We are not going inside of the archive and repository. There are
some standards for each of the contents, and we are going to
include those standards as time matures.
Q. Has the milestone changed significantly since the last BOF session?
A. No. The milestone presented is the one in the charter with updates to the
past milestones.
Q. Do you have any reference implementation?
A. We have two candidates now. The Business Grid Project and NAREGI PSE.
Q. Since this activity will require changes for CDDLM, will ACS change its
spec as well?
A. We have not yet decided anything. we are open to modification taking
into consideration of CDDLM.
** NAREGI PSE
The outline and possible relationship to ACS are presented by Prof. Kawata.
Q. How do you determine the granularity of archive? Are mathematical
libraries included in an archive?
A. What should be included in archives depends on the situation or the Grid
systems. We expect ACS to have flexibility as to what the IT resources in
the Grid system should provide.
Q. What extent is the definition of ACS(NAREGI PSE?) service? Do you have
schema?
A. We already have some schema taken from the Business Grid Project. We
expect collaboration with SI, which has comprehensive schema already. So
we are planning to integrate these schemas. SI scope seems to be larger
than us. SI can handle Grid applications but not limited to the Grid.
They are trying to accommodate every software in a single standard. ACS
archive schema could be one part of that, specific to Grid applications.
** Grid appliance usecase (presented by Peter Ziu)
The future vision of the ACS, OGSA and beyond is explained. No questions.
** Business Grid Project (presented by Keisuke Fukui)
Q. Do the three companies share development outcomes? Are you also going to
share IT resources in data centers?
A. Business Grid Project is an experimental project to develop a new
framework for system management, and thus we are currently working very
closely to create a single Grid Middleware. As for a commercially-
operating data center, we have not yet discussed about operating a single
or multiple data centers running that Grid Middleware.
Q. Do people working in Business Grid Project agree that ACS will provide
this capability?
A. The Business Grid middleware is now under development at their last
stage. We are talking closely so that two won't conflict with each other.
We may refactor the ACS spec. or request modifications of the
implementation if it is appropriate.
Q. Is the solution provided by the Business Grid Project independent of ACS
implementation?
A. We are inspired from the Business Grid Project and I'd like to keep close
relationship with it. However, we are open to any discussion, since we
are the wg in GGF.
** wrap up.
We ran out of the time at the end and called for participation to the second
session to join the detailed discussion of the ACS-WG activities in future.
-------------- next part --------------
GGF13 Application Contents Service (ACS) session #2
Date and Time: Mar. 16, 2005, 11:00 - 12:30
Place: Lotte Hotel Onyx Room
Lead: Keisuke Fukui (Fujitsu)
Notes: Sachiko Wada (Ascade)
** Agenda
- Opening salutation
Introduction & note takers
- Review of the fist session.
- Use cases and visions
"Installable Unit Deployment Descriptor" by Thomas Studwell (IBM)
* "Installable Unit Deployment Descriptor"
The outline and current status were presented by Thomas Studwell. Below
questions and answered were exchanged during the presentation.
Q. Do you have any plan to go inside the install artifact?
A. No. The artifact is the one which is referenced from the IU and
SI(IUDD) activity do not go inside itself.
Q. Do you think you can have platform-neutral install artifacts?
A. Currently it is assumed that the artifact itself is platform specific.
A comment from Keisuke:
Requirements for IUDD are very similar to those for ACS, which is expected
to be a single standard for software installation. We hope Grid-specific
features will be considered in the future IUDD standardization.
Q. Are you going to plan for refactoring current IUDD spec?
A. Yes. We are going to submit IUDD spec to a formal workgroup and
develop a totally new spec. The new workgroup will consider all of the
industry requirements. I expect that CDDLM, ACS, and any other interested
workgroups that need standard deployment descriptor to share the
specification. I expect contributions both from implementation
perspective from the participants.
* ACS specification
The strawman specification is introduced to show what we have today. We are
going to have a single document that specify the ACS, as a WG draft after
the WG discussion by the GGF14 in June.
- table of contents
- goals and non-goals
* Wrap up
A tentative roadmap is shown and agreed to discuss about how we proceed our
activity through either e-mails, tele-conferences and/or face-to-face
meetings.
More information about the acs-wg
mailing list