[acs-wg] Issues list on tracker

[Keisuke Fukui]

Thanks Mike for a heads up,

I put it there because I remember, in the last F2F, there was an opinion
that the current use case in the spec. document is sufficient and
doesn't require any further collection of them. However, the priority
here doesn't block discussing or adding use cases. We can move it
into among high priorities if we are sure of pursuing more on this by
GGF14.

I share your opinion that the use case is important.

  -Keisuke

Michael Behrens wrote:
> Thanks Keisuke!
> I suggest that 1528 should be a higher priority as our process is 
> use-case driven.  Maybe it should be the same as # 1530, pri-2.
> 
> Keisuke Fukui wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>>
>> As discussed in this week's call, I have added artifacts to "Issues in 
>> spec."
>> tracker. Please take a look if they are correct in priority and their 
>> contents.
>>
>> https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=147&atid=805&filter=&f_artifact_id=&f_priority=&f_assigned_to=&f_artifact_status=&f_category=&f_artifact_group=&group_id=147&atid=805&sort0=priority 
>>
>>
>> Those who can take response of items, please help yourself to get
>> assignments:-)
>>
>> FYI,
>> I added each item as shown in the F2F output except for the
>> "Open Issues in Strawman Draft of the ACS Spec."; for these,
>> I have omitted some duplicate and outdated items.
>>
>> Have fun!
>>  -Keisuke
>>
>>
>>
>