FW: [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc for ACS

[Keisuke Fukui]

Hi Pete,

Thanks for compilation of the information. It is fine for the most part.

Item 9: English.
Item 15, 16: GGF, I guess. However, for the URI for the rules, the admin of
              the scrm will find the most appropriate URI. So let's leave them
              as blank.  Or "(GGF)" looks better?
Item 18: Not sure if we can fill here with planned but not yet visible
          implementation. I guess this corresponds to the adoption columns
          standard status table we saw at the GGF14 scrm meeting. So I think
          "NAREGI project and Business Grid project has plans" would be a
          fair description.
Item 19: We are not referring CDDLM *normatively*, but will just demonstrate
          or introduce the capability to interact with CDDLM. For the Solution
          Installation, we will eventually refer it in some way, but not yet.
          So I think "We are expecting that OASIS SDD is referred normatively."
          would be a fair description.
Item 20: Yes. Let's fill here with "OGSA v1"

These are the all comments from me. I don't have any issues on all others you
filled. My apologies to my late response.

  -Keisuke


Ziu, Peter wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments/corrections on/to this document before it 
> goes to Hiro? (see attached)  If we could get a review of this document 
> on the agenda for next meeting (or just comments in email) it would be 
> greatly appreciated.
>  
> Pete.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* owner-acs-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-acs-wg at ggf.org]*On Behalf Of 
> *pete at ziu.net
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:16 PM
> *To:* kfukui at labs.fujitsu.com
> *Cc:* acs-wg at ggf.org
> *Subject:* [acs-wg] scrm-pvt - first draft of Landscape Information doc 
> for ACS
> 
> Keisuke and group,
> 
> I have been requested by Hiro to submit the SCRM draft Landscape 
> Information doc for ACS specification to him, so that he may pass it up 
> to SCRM. This is an informational document about all specs of interest 
> within SCRM, to help sort out the numerous efforts in the management 
> space. I have updated the form I originally sent to you to the latest 
> draft version. I have inserted comments since it is in need of review. I 
> would like to make sure I am properly reflecting ACS facts. Tom, might 
> you find time to review as well (especially the check box things? Do you 
> think we might be able to review next meeting?
> 
> Pete Ziu
> 571.235.0208 (c)
> mailto:pete at ziu.net (h)
> mailto:5712350208 at tmomail.net (sms)
>