NYTimes snitches Ukraine phone call whistleblower, tries to rationalize it under false pretenses
Recognizing that outing the whistleblower may not be viewed as an appropriate decision, the report included a quote from Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the Times, where he stated, “The role of the whistleblower, including his credibility and his place in the government, is essential to understanding one of the most important issues facing the country—whether the president of the United States abused power and whether the White House covered it up.”
It actually is not. The contents of the disclosure are all the public needs to determine whether the president committed an abuse of power, covered up an abuse of power, and engaged in conduct that rises to the level of impeachment.
The inspector general’s office for the “intelligence community” already determined—within the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act—that the allegations rose to the level of a matter of “urgent concern.” That gave the whistleblower credibility, regardless of what any politician in Congress or staff member in the White House may say."
https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-ukr... Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
Identity of the CIA Whistleblower Already the whistleblower is under attack and threated with retribution, unlikely to be defended by any of the parties involved despite protection regulations. Only the public can protect the party against closed government ranks and official secrecy practices. Dominant issue now is, are, the whistleblower complaint cover-up(s): why CIA counsel reported the complaint to White House beyond required simple notification, records of the extended discussions among CIA, White House, DoJ and ODNI, why the White House hid the allegedly unclassified materal in a highly classified server, who was involved in stalling and hiding, was the hidden material modified, were copies and/or back-ups made to assure accuracy, who had access to the hidden material, when will it be made public in full withut redactions of any material and any related substantiation. Then, what other material was handled in this manner, and same disclosures about that material. At 12:28 AM 9/27/2019, you wrote:
Recognizing that outing the whistleblower may not be viewed as an appropriate decision, the report included a quote from Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the Times, where he stated, âThe role of the whistleblower, including his credibility and his place in the government, is essential to understanding one of the most important issues facing the countrywhether the president of the United States abused power and whetheer the White House covered it up.â
It actually is not. The contents of the disclosure are all the public needs to determine whether the president committed an abuse of power, covered up an abuse of power, and engaged in conduct that rises to the level of impeachment.
The inspector generalâs office for the âintelligence communityâ already determinedwithin the Intelligence Commuunity Whistleblower Protection Actthat the allegations rose to the level of a matter of âurgent concern.â That gave the whistleblower credibility, regardless of what any politician in Congress or staff member in the White House may say."
<https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-ukraine-call-whistleblower-complaint-sparks-outrage/>https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-ukraine-call-whistleblower-complaint-sparks-outrage/ Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
participants (2)
-
John Young -
Razer