No one is obligated to participate in the investigation against me
It is to my understanding that if I were to ask for technical advice on a web forum under a different username, people would be made aware of my identity by government investigators monitoring me. Which is not ordinarily a problem, but considering I was framed about a decade ago, it is. I ask everyone, politely, to not participate. If the investigation was valid, the government would be doing things that pass the smell test. It doesn’t make sense for the government to be doing this for so long, and the government is behaving as if they are hiding something. There is the question of what the government does when I go interact with an online community of people who wouldn’t know about me. The solution to that is simple, for Steam, the US government simply pretends to be the person on the other side of the screen. The government right now is trying parallel construct an entire investigation and is failing because I keep associating one investigation with the other. This is ludicrous, I don’t know how anyone can say the government is engaging in legal conduct with a straight face when the government’s behavior is absolutely unnecessary and seems to hinder whatever their self-stated objectives are.
Hi Ryan sounds like you are in a horrible predicament. Best thing you can do is 1. Loose your internet connection 2. Smash cell phone 3. Junk all smart devices 4. Get rid of car 5. Take all money out banks 6. Move out in woods live off land. 7. Take gramp with you This should get you started in the right direction. Oh ya if they have unknowingly installed a chip in you your fucked. Best regards rooty -------- Original Message -------- On May 8, 2019, 12:34 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
It is to my understanding that if I were to ask for technical advice on a web forum under a different username, people would be made aware of my identity by government investigators monitoring me. Which is not ordinarily a problem, but considering I was framed about a decade ago, it is.
I ask everyone, politely, to not participate. If the investigation was valid, the government would be doing things that pass the smell test. It doesn’t make sense for the government to be doing this for so long, and the government is behaving as if they are hiding something.
There is the question of what the government does when I go interact with an online community of people who wouldn’t know about me. The solution to that is simple, for Steam, the US government simply pretends to be the person on the other side of the screen.
The government right now is trying parallel construct an entire investigation and is failing because I keep associating one investigation with the other.
This is ludicrous, I don’t know how anyone can say the government is engaging in legal conduct with a straight face when the government’s behavior is absolutely unnecessary and seems to hinder whatever their self-stated objectives are.
On 5/8/19 3:34 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
It is to my understanding that if I were to ask for technical advice on a web forum under a different username, people would be made aware of my identity by government investigators monitoring me. Which is not ordinarily a problem, but considering I was framed about a decade ago, it is.
That sounds like standard police work to me. When an investigatory agency receives a directive to take someone down, or individuals in such agencies develop personal a personal grudge against someone, they shift gears from passive observation to active harassment. A very long time ago, I fed a snitch "bad information" on purpose, then turn him against his buddies in blue. He was fishing for information about criminal activities some of my old friends never did, and that /really/ pissed me off. It turned out that 'they' already had me listed for disposal, so my instincts did not mislead me: I had nothing to lose by kicking their shins... According to my source, the principal technique police investigators use to dispose of inconvenient people consists of interviewing their employers, any 'friends of the force' they may happen to know. Their leading questions paint a picture of the victim as a member of a terrorist conspiracy, an uncaught serial rapist, or whatever else the interviewee would most strongly react to. After learning all they can about the targeted individual from these interviews, investigators sit back and let the seeds they have planted do their work. The victim usually finds him or herself unemployed soon enough after the employer has "learned the truth." Keeping the targeted individual unemployed by poisoning background checks, and/or by responding promptly with the above mentioned tactics when any new employer files State documents (sometimes within hours these days, thanks to Surveillance State infrastructure) follows. How can a targeted individual turn this off? In some cases, a criminal conviction - any criminal conviction - might do the trick: Mission accomplished, etc. In some cases, moving to another State might do the trick - if the scope of the harassment does not extend past a County or State agency. Just maintaining a low profile and allowing time to pass might reduce the active harassment below the threshold where it matters. In some instances, explaining the situation to a potential employer in advance of the approach by a hostile party might - but lots of luck finding prospects who would not assume you're a paranoid looney. :o/
participants (3)
-
rooty -
Ryan Carboni -
Steve Kinney