No reporter in north america Pierre gave over a million dollars to the cia to help eat the ukraine Maybe they are news gathering to scope out where the next good eats are On May 17, 2016 4:48 AM, "Rayzer" wrote:

On 05/16/2016 12:09 PM, J wrote:

Content generated by the team will be featured on news.trust.org, the

...

Thomson Reuters Foundation’s website, and on place.trust.org, the new platform dedicated to land and property rights.

Who would possibly trust an organization whose domain name is "trust.org"? I know nothing else about this group, but from that fact alone it's obvious they are not to be trusted.

You don't know what Reuters is? This is the parent organization.

The "Trust" moniker derives from the early 1900 and 1800s. It indicated a sort of conglomerate or coop approach to business. and those sorts of organizations often grew so large they were like monopolies. Hence the phrase: "Trust-Buster" http://www.ushistory.org/us/43b.asp

On 5/16/16, J wrote:

...

Content generated by the team will be featured on news.trust.org, the Thomson Reuters Foundation’s website, and on place.trust.org, the new platform dedicated to land and property rights.

Who would possibly trust an organization whose domain name is "trust.org"? I know nothing else about this group, but from that fact alone it's obvious they are not to be trusted.

Intending to raise awareness of issues around the primary foundation of capitalism ("property rights") is not a bad thing per se. But I have concerns with this already - Reuters to me is MSM - 'a billion readers a day' - 'aims to generate and curate trusted news' yeah I'm sure they do, but is this something you say? - "the world’s first global news team dedicated to coverage of land and property rights" sounds like an agenda about to be pushed by the current MSM/ planetary power brokers - "the launch of a new digital platform" - GTFOOH, a new digital platform! aren't we all going to be impressed - Yee Haw people, someone's about to save the world (now where's an old Sega system) My greatest concern is that this media platform could be a foundation for promoting and facilitating changes which will empower capitalist opportunism enslaving people to a greater and greater degree - i.e. empowering those who already have monetary power in the world to increase their monetary power over those in the world who they currently have difficulty enslaving due to LACK of property ownership rights! Stability of community and family requires stability of: - access to clean water for drinking, cooking and growing food - right to use land to grow food - warmth, i.e. a roof and heating and cooking ability - and prosperity requires (I think) the right to freedom of free and anonymous travel. "Inordinate wealth" (i.e. enslaving other humans) can be achieved with property ownership - the owner then becomes a land lord, collecting rent; that's difficult to achieve with NO property ownership - i.e. if you're allowed to live in your house without paying rent, grow food without someone taking that food, and barter than food and your work efforts without being taxed and can travel freely, then you are essentially free - BUT land and property OWNERSHIP fucks that all up. Ownership of land per se is not a prerequisite to stable and abundant community, and indeed "ownership" of land has ultimately been the foundation of Western society's --massive-- wealth divide. Phrases like "rent seekers", opportunists, rates and taxation, leverage of capital and ultimately widespread economic slavery ought come to mind at this point... Russia is still giving plots of land to its people, and does not allow sale inside of the first 5 years of ownership. My view is that this time period should be greater, or perhaps documents should be made readily available so those who are inclined, protect said land for their grandchildren's use (and not sale) in a legal trust. (I'll grant the original marketing material is pretty slick, but bypasses a metric tonne of important, --foundation-- considerations; agenda or ignorance, take your pick.)

On 05/16/2016 10:36 PM, juan wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2016 08:35:28 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

...

Fomenting media about indigenous land rights...

omidyar and the reuters mafia babbling about 'land rights' make as much sense as jack the ripper lecturing on morality.

I sense you, like many fanatics, don't see the value of the 'small cracks' these sorts of things make in 'systems'. Let's talk conspiracy Juan, cause I KNOW you're bound to be one of those 'conspiracy nutjobs'. "Power Elite Conspiracies" exist but they are NOT overarching, cast in stone things with some 'plan' that made them happen. Conspiracies muddle through by hedging all bets. Any way the cards fall you win SOMETHING, and over time that something is at least additive if not geometrically or logarithmically enhanced. It's up to the proles to take advantage of the hedges that work for them. Because no one else is going to do it. Even the most perverse skewed reporting on an issue is better than none at all for too many reasons to enumerate here. If the proles can't figure out the media trap their ensnared in educate them. You'd just scoff. Hella solution. "I think people have the capacities to see through the deceit in which they're ensnared, but you've got to make the effort" ~Noam Chomsky He says so right here > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIsZwGbi9g8 (snigger, that's Tom Morello's mama announcing.) Ah but you think Chomsky's a CIA 'operator' don't you Juan? And Tom Morello, and Zack De La Rocha, and Abbie Hoffman Karl Marx, Groucho Marx, and Trotsky too. I guess everyone should just give up and not do anything at all. BTW, USAID is on the list of foundation donors. The skew is EASY to see, and EASY to work around just by those agency's visibility in the organization. Rr

On Tue, 17 May 2016 08:13:44 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

On 05/16/2016 10:36 PM, juan wrote:

...

On Mon, 16 May 2016 08:35:28 -0700 Rayzer wrote:

...

Fomenting media about indigenous land rights...

omidyar and the reuters mafia babbling about 'land rights' make as much sense as jack the ripper lecturing on morality.

I sense you, like many fanatics, don't see the value of the 'small cracks' these sorts of things make in 'systems'.

Oh, I do see the value of what your master omidyar does. I know qute well how propaganda works. The 'cracks' in the system are useful to keep the fake opposition happy. "Controlled opposition" Look it up. In wikipedia.

Let's talk conspiracy Juan, cause I KNOW you're bound to be one of those 'conspiracy nutjobs'.

Ok. So I'm a 'fanatic nutjob'. I'd rather be that instead of an omidyar lapdog.

"Power Elite Conspiracies" exist but they are NOT overarching, cast in stone things with some 'plan' that made them happen. Conspiracies muddle through by hedging all bets. Any way the cards fall you win SOMETHING, and over time that something is at least additive if not geometrically or logarithmically enhanced.

Handwaving and bullshit.

It's up to the proles to take advantage of the hedges that work for them. Because no one else is going to do it. Even the most perverse skewed reporting on an issue is better than none at all for too many reasons to enumerate here.

Sure, sure, sure. How could I have missed the invaluable value of establishment propaganda? Silly me.

If the proles can't figure out the media trap their ensnared in educate them. You'd just scoff. Hella solution.

"I think people have the capacities to see through the deceit in which they're ensnared, but you've got to make the effort" ~Noam Chomsky

He says so right here > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIsZwGbi9g8 (snigger, that's Tom Morello's mama announcing.)

Ah but you think Chomsky's a CIA 'operator' don't you Juan?

I know chomsky is a sick piece of shit. I aldready provided the data. Here it goes again. http://www.hoover.org/research/noam-chomsky-closet-capitalist http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/authors/noam-chomsky-ne...

And Tom Morello, and Zack De La Rocha, and Abbie Hoffman Karl Marx, Groucho Marx, and Trotsky too.

lol rayzer - you are a cheap marxist - you can't get more totalitarian than that. go kill people who don't obey The State's Traffic Laws.

I guess everyone should just give up and not do anything at all.

BTW, USAID is on the list of foundation donors. The skew is EASY to see, and EASY to work around just by those agency's visibility in the organization.

Rr