[crazy][daydream] EM receptors modeled after the human eye
from “is it directional? how cheap could you make a big antenna?” i am not a radio engineer. satellite dishes use the reflection of metal to focus signals onto a receptor. the curved shape behind them is analogous to the lens of the eye, bending the radiation differently depending on what part it strikes. usually they are designed to focus parallel radiation from an effectively infinitely distant source in outer space (with a parabolic shape). they can instead be designed to focus emission from a specific arbitrarily located relative fixed point at a specific arbitrary distance (with a spherical shape). the two curves are physically similar but focus differently. they could also surface soft or hinged material so as to change how they focus live. this would be analogous to how the muscles of the eye reshape the lens so as to focus near or far. similarly you could put an array of sensors at the receptor rather than a single one. high-end radio telescopes do this, outputting a small count of pixels rather than a single signal. these are analogous to the retina, the array of receptors in the back of the eye. once you put two of them next to each other on gymbals, the stereoscopic vision you are making analogy to is possibly what radio astronomers do to triangulate distances from two different locations — but if your reflectir is bending itself to focus on something near rather than far you are doing something a little different. […]
thoughts: i suppose you could also make a transmissive lens, the calculations may likely be based on the speed of the radiation through the material, what cameras do is is change the distance between lenses rather than shape them; this could be done with two mirrors facing each other, the larger likely with a hole in it i wonder if you could make a cheap receiver array by wiring many tiny antenna to transistors or such to multiplex among them
usually they are designed to focus parallel radiation from an effectively
infinitely distant source in outer space (with a parabolic shape). they can instead be designed to focus emission from a specific arbitrarily located relative fixed point at a specific arbitrary distance (with a spherical shape). the two curves are physically similar but focus differently.
i looked this up a little and it is not correct. spherical mirrors are used to approximate parts of parabolic mirrors. an ellipsoid mirror can focus between two focal points i think? then the receiver can be shaped curved to make the different “pixels” work out. there can be 1 or 2 or 3 mirrors …
[another approach is to do all the focusing in software and collect more radiation with simply more metal. this is how normal radios are done. the two could possibly be combined such that reflective parts serve to —
i’m now starting to imagine things like e.g. mirrors shaped like the base of a cone behind an open pupil that serve to bounce out signal not within a frustrum and then reflective curving that bounces radiation within the frustrum at a shallow angle into the entrance to a spiralling long cylinde or cone similar to the cochlea within the inner ear that serves to collect as much as possible using long strips of reflective antenna along the inside i imagine it could keep refining and might end up looking organic somewhat and maybe it would be useful to simulate it to automate that
algorithm could attempt to maximize signal within visual field that struck antenna surfaces minus signal outside the visual field or such, then maximize the difference in which areas of the visual field struck different antennas …
participants (1)
-
Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many