Cryptocurrency: Costs of Fiat are Unsustainable Not Crypto, VZ Bitcoin Satellite, CloudFlare
On 9/26/20, Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:
https://decrypt.co/43000/no-internet-no-problem-venezuela-gets-bitcoin-satel...
It's also uplifting to see the speed that some of the crypto food, charity, and monetary networks are able to help provide options and solutions to troubled regions. The libertarian sort of nature of cryptocurrency will continue making larger impacts as time goes on. And thanks to decrypt.co for not using CloudFlare to block Tor users from reading their site. Too many crypto news aggregators and crypto services sites seem perhaps not aware of what their CloudFlare settings are doing in that regard. That's the whole point with satellite, privacy coins, etc... to route around silly censorship blocking. If people like decrypt.co, send them some satoshi for bandwidth, and get them setup with their own .onion / .i2p.
I must say congrats to Venezuela for the idea to communicate via a satellite in space, when Internet connectivity sucks.
Yes, the leading distributed permissionless uncensorable privacy cryptos are all making cool progress in Venezuela, and in satcom and other comms, as posted in various fora... https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin+Bitcoincash+CryptoCurrencies+CryptoCurrency+Monero+btc/search/?q=venezuela+OR+satellite&sort=top&restrict_sr=on https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-September/082278.html
While I must admit that I am no longer a fan of crypto currencies (huge global energy resources waste IMHO)
And what analysis are people basing that on? It is clear that people are forgetting to add up ALL of the global resources wasted on supporting Fiat Currencies. That is an understandable oversight given that all of the major media and fraudulent anti-crypto "research" reporting on "energy resource waste"... (their analysis is funded by obsolete Banks Governments Corporations all dependant on each other to exist in Fiat)... typically only adds up the mining costs, and fails to do a comparison to Fiat at all, let alone a high quality honest comparison that strives to include... ALL of the... Electricity used by paper bill printing and coin stamping machines globally. All their shredders and smelters and mining and tree sawing and paper making chemical processes deforestation, the distribution channels, and gasoline, diesel, coal, oil, lubrication, maintenance. Pollution costs, lung cancer costs, physical waste costs. Safe storage and transport costs for "money". Printing employee costs, wasted closed market government dictated health care costs. Cash register, security cam, alarm systems electricity. And all that and *much* more is just for physicality of producing and handling with it. Then they did also forget to add up ALL the Bank building costs, maintenance, daily commute costs, wear on and pollution from their tires. The cost fees they steal from you to "hold" your money and move it around for you, 2 and 20 management, and the costs to get it back when they censor and lock your flow. All their computers on their desks, all their lights, all the electricity and chems used to process their feces that flow down their toilet sewers before it hits the river, oopsie. They forgot ALL the existence of Government "laws" around money... all the "law" editors, publishers, glitzy marble government buildings, $170k/year salary that Government "representatives" steal from you to waste hours debating Fiat on their floors, and dabbling in politically immune corruption. Cost of all the Fiat Bank lobbyists, their air travel, and so much more. Cost of prisons and loss of all your assets and property for using it to buy and sell harmless plants, or to exchange cryptocurrencies with each other without a "license". Then add up the entirely Government "leader" initiated WARS over monetary trade imbalances, to take out other "leaders" and easy centralized Fiat targets. Their epic initiations of murderous immoral force to steal more resources and trap up people to fund the "growth" needed to offset the crippling debt inherent with how Fiat is created by Central Banks and Govt without imploding. Go ahead... add it all up, ALL OF IT, all that wasted energy in the entire Global System of Fiat that is rapidly becoming obsolete by cryptocurrency. Fiat currency is so wasteful that it makes even a world based only on Gold and Silver, sans Govt involvement, look resource cheap in comparison to Fiat's all-in costs. Nor do people realize that in the long term, cryptocurrency can, does, and will run on little more, relatively speaking in comparison, than sand (silicon) and solar power. In fact, solar's free clean renewable input will be among few competitive ways remaining, with wind, and nuclear a bit more. And without Government in the way propping up energy legacies, and with open markets and self and other unsystem schooling options, uncensored peer to peer comms around the world, allowing people to see through GovCorp secrets and lies, and make new enlightened choices for their own Earth environment... crypto continues to look very good. Anyone trying to step to cryptocurrency talking the typical dishonest limited scope "energy waste" weaksauce will get destroyed by even armchair estimates of all-in costs.
On Saturday, September 26, 2020, 08:42:20 PM PDT, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On 9/26/20, Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:
https://decrypt.co/43000/no-internet-no-problem-venezuela-gets-bitcoin-satel...
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin+Bitcoincash+CryptoCurrencies+CryptoCurrency+Monero+btc/search/?q=venezuela+OR+satellite&sort=top&restrict_sr=on https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-September/082278.html
While I must admit that I am no longer a fan of crypto currencies (huge global energy resources waste IMHO)
And what analysis are people basing that on?
I occasionally mention my idea, from a few years ago, that the "work", as in "proof of work" for coins like Bitcoin, could be shifted to weather forecasting, from finding specific hashes. Not that I know how to implement that!!! But my idea is, we will "always" need to forecast the weather, and the computations for this will continue to be huge, for the foreseeable future. So, such computations are inherently valuable. See: "jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com>To:ryan.pear@ownbay.net,cypherpunks@cpunks.org Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:14 PM
About Repbin: Repbin is an encrypted pastebin for the command line that runs over Tor! Repbin servers form a distributed network where nodes sync posts with each other (like in Usenet or BBS/Fido systems). This makes Repbin resilient and scalable. Repbin focuses on privacy (encrypted messages) and anonymity (padding and repost chains). To limit spam and denial-of-service attacks, Repbin uses the Hashcash proof-of-work algorithm which is widely known from Bitcoin mining. Learn more about Repbin here: https://github.com/repbin/repbin/blob/master/README.md Has anybody ever considered the idea of doing otherwise-useful CPU work with the power currently expended by computing hashes in Bitcoin mining? The most obvious application would be weather forecasting: It could use a huge amount of computation, on a continuously ongoing basis, and is valuable to every nation on earth. Whether it can be lasso'ed into a bitcoin-mining engine, I don't know. Jim Bell
On 9/27/20, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
I occasionally mention my idea, from a few years ago, that the "work", as in "proof of work" for coins like Bitcoin, could be shifted to weather forecasting, from finding specific hashes. Not that I know how to implement that!!! But my idea is, we will "always" need to forecast the weather, and the computations for this will continue to be huge, for the foreseeable future. So, such computations are inherently valuable.
Sure, bitcoin being a race to find answer to a random problem that then passes consensus confirmation, that's valuable, and anyone can do that equally by dropping in any fraction of hardware (differing power costs, centralized ASIC favored deals and presale mining, cost/TH scaling, etc, excepted). Weather forecasting can be equally valuable work. But can everyone have same random odds at success? ie: What is the distribution of results from PhD roomful of weather.gov weather.com google types vs Joe Random sticking his finger in the air, and guessing correctly going to look like? Will distributed armies of Joes match the former to keep centralization away? Then there are time delays between weather prediction and weather event / proof, turning it into a bit of a futures game and possible market. There are some coins trying do "useful work" for coinbase / mining rewards. People will have to search them out and post them here. Unlike gambling on solution to weather stream, many of those coins rely on problematic inputs, risks to centralization, such as solving work units provided by GovCorp streams that can be disrupted, predicted, insidered, gamed, etc. You can always use mining rigs to heat your place in the winter... 100% efficient return on electricity input, minus a little bit of sound, wind, light, and data entropy output :) It's also some work to calculate hashrate, BTU equivalents, efficiencies, amortization, payback, etc amongst all the options for what and how to mine. Then cryptos price changes like stock market and forces a recalc. For that matter, if you can predict weather, you can predict stock market, ball games, next assassinations, and the entire USA 2020 nationwide election results :) Then someone comes and takes your toy away, beats your game, or all participants just end up with the same tech in time.
See: "jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com To:ryan.pear@ownbay.net,cypherpunks@cpunks.org Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:14 PM
denial-of-service attacks, Repbin uses the Hashcash proof-of-work algorithm which is widely known from Bitcoin mining. https://github.com/repbin/repbin/blob/master/README.md
Has anybody ever considered the idea of doing otherwise-useful CPU work with the power currently expended by computing hashes in Bitcoin mining? The most obvious application would be weather forecasting: It could use a huge amount of computation, on a continuously ongoing basis, and is valuable to every nation on earth. Whether it can be lasso'ed into a bitcoin-mining engine, I don't know. Jim Bell
The only reason bitcoin is an energy waste is because of the development and publicity situation. There are numerous solutions to making cryptocurrency energy-linear and appropriately anonymous, but these are all used by altchains rather than bitcoin core. It's notable that people might trust bitcoin more if balances were not immediately available on a block explorer. Of course those balances can be quite wrong because a wallet is made of many private keys. With some effective and supportive human work among or near the core team, the problems would resolve quickly. Meanwhile many support bitcoin because we need popular control and transparent cryptographic reliability in the global economy. It makes us money to have math in competition with politics, and verifies integrity of our records and messages. I hope. I've been shifting towards ethereum a little again. There's a Wrapped BTC token for trading bitcoin on ethereum dexs. I haven't looked at the contracts to verify reliability at all, though. Ideally it would get block and tx hashes stored cross-chain, dunno whether it does. Learn and practice smart contracts.
Has anybody ever considered the idea of doing otherwise-useful CPU work with the power currently expended by computing hashes in Bitcoin mining? The most obvious application would be weather forecasting: It could use a huge amount of computation, on a continuously ongoing basis, and is valuable to every nation on earth. Whether it can be lasso'ed into a bitcoin-mining engine, I don't know. Jim Bell
Just to answer this directly, yes, a lot of people have had such ideas. Many have likely been implemented in altchains. I have software development experience and I would assist a project using permanent storage and serving of arbitrary community data as its proof of work. Such a chain could also offer anonymous behavior.
grarpamp wrote:
While I must admit that I am no longer a fan of crypto currencies (huge global energy resources waste IMHO)
And what analysis are people basing that on?
Please do a Google search with this string: 'crypto currency global energy waste' and you will find various articles. Not to mention that Bitcoin mining is nowadays for the average joe user absolutely not profitable. <https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/btc?HashingPower=40&HashingUnit=TH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=1500&CostPerkWh=0.12&MiningPoolFee=1> Check the prices, for example, for those Bitmain Antminer's and compare that when all began and when mining Bitcoin was profitable. And regarding privacy, I do not like the fact that on a Bitcoin Blockchain Explorer everybody can see your account balance and what transactions you have made. Regards Stefan
participants (4)
-
grarpamp
-
jim bell
-
Karl
-
Stefan Claas