Riffle: an efficient communication system with strong anonymity
On 07/11/2016 05:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
http://news.mit.edu/2016/stay-anonymous-online-0711 https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/99859 https://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/riffle.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/99859/927718269-MIT.pdf
I was just about to post that. So I wonder whether it will be implemented. Dissent never was, as far as I know. I'd be up for hosting a Riffle server, if there were code and instructions somewhere. But I see nothing on GitHub about this Riffle.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:52:57PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
On 07/11/2016 05:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
http://news.mit.edu/2016/stay-anonymous-online-0711 https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/99859 https://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/riffle.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/99859/927718269-MIT.pdf
I was just about to post that.
So I wonder whether it will be implemented. Dissent never was, as far as I know.
https://github.com/DeDiS/Dissent -- otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt
On 07/12/2016 07:04 AM, stef wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:52:57PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
On 07/11/2016 05:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
http://news.mit.edu/2016/stay-anonymous-online-0711 https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/99859 https://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/riffle.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/99859/927718269-MIT.pdf
I was just about to post that.
So I wonder whether it will be implemented. Dissent never was, as far as I know.
OK, but is there a network of appreciable size?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:33:40 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"But the recent discovery of vulnerabilities in the most popular of these networks — Tor —" Recent? LMAO at these shitbags. On the other hand, what would the tor bots say, now that it's vox populi at places like mit that their beloved 'anonimity' scam doesn't work? "The heart of the system is a series of servers called a mixnet. " Go figure. I thought mixnets had been rejected by the greatest geniuses of the crypto world, lead by that motherfucking scumbag paul syverson? Or maybe that was a tor-thing too...
On 07/11/2016 06:01 PM, juan wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:33:40 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"But the recent discovery of vulnerabilities in the most popular of these networks — Tor —"
Recent? LMAO at these shitbags. On the other hand, what would the tor bots say, now that it's vox populi at places like mit that their beloved 'anonimity' scam doesn't work?
Probably a reference to the relay early bug that CMU team exploited.
"The heart of the system is a series of servers called a mixnet. "
Go figure. I thought mixnets had been rejected by the greatest geniuses of the crypto world, lead by that motherfucking scumbag paul syverson? Or maybe that was a tor-thing too...
The paper explains background: https://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/riffle.pdf Also Kwon's thesis: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/99859/927718269-MIT.pdf
On July 11, 2016 8:01:11 PM EDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:33:40 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"But the recent discovery of vulnerabilities in the most popular of these networks — Tor —"
Recent? LMAO at these shitbags. On the other hand, what would the tor bots say, now that it's vox populi at places like mit that their beloved 'anonimity' scam doesn't work?
"The heart of the system is a series of servers called a mixnet. "
Go figure. I thought mixnets had been rejected by the greatest geniuses of the crypto world, lead by that motherfucking scumbag paul syverson? Or maybe that was a tor-thing too...
I run a low bandwidth tor relay (150K), just for kicks. It's not an exit node because I don't want the hassle that goes with that (my node name twentysevendollars). Sometimes I like to run network programs through torsocks for a little potential anonymity.... otherwise I don't even use tor much myself. I never made any promises to anyone about true anonymity. Am I a Pentagon employed duplicitous Americunt? Or just someone that likes to fuck around on his freebsd server? John
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:01 AM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:33:40 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"But the recent discovery of vulnerabilities in the most popular of these networks — Tor —"
Recent? LMAO at these shitbags. On the other hand, what would the tor bots say, now that it's vox populi at places like mit that their beloved 'anonimity' scam doesn't work?
recently humans invented a way to make the fire
"The heart of the system is a series of servers called a mixnet. "
Go figure. I thought mixnets had been rejected by the greatest geniuses of the crypto world, lead by that motherfucking scumbag paul syverson? Or maybe that was a tor-thing too...
fatherfucking -- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:33:40PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
Interesting. So far read only this (it is for dummies). Is riffle resistant to active timing attacks (possibly from internal nodes)? Can sufficiently many malicious nodes cause total DOS? (I suspect they will decrease performance at least).
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:43:48AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:33:40PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
Interesting. So far read only this (it is for dummies).
Is riffle resistant to active timing attacks (possibly from internal nodes)?
Can sufficiently many malicious nodes cause total DOS? (I suspect they will decrease performance at least).
Two days ago I spammed the authors of the Riffle paper with this, no reply so far. My guess is it is vulnerable to active timing attacks, they are so generic. Not sure at all jitter is solution.
https://github.com/kwonalbert/riffle Bastiani Fortress:
Are there still no implementations yet?
12:09 PM, August 2, 2016, Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com>:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:43:48AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:33:40PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > http://news.mit.edu/2016/stay-anonymous-online-0711
Interesting. So far read only this (it is for dummies).
Is riffle resistant to active timing attacks (possibly from internal nodes)?
Can sufficiently many malicious nodes cause total DOS? (I suspect they will decrease performance at least).
Two days ago I spammed the authors of the Riffle paper with this, no reply so far.
My guess is it is vulnerable to active timing attacks, they are so generic. Not sure at all jitter is solution.
-- You’re not from the Castle, you’re not from the village, you are nothing. Unfortunately, though, you are something, a stranger.
There is this: https://github.com/kwonalbert/riffle Bastiani Fortress:
Are there still no implementations yet?
12:09 PM, August 2, 2016, Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com>:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:43:48AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:33:40PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > http://news.mit.edu/2016/stay-anonymous-online-0711
Interesting. So far read only this (it is for dummies).
Is riffle resistant to active timing attacks (possibly from internal nodes)?
Can sufficiently many malicious nodes cause total DOS? (I suspect they will decrease performance at least).
Two days ago I spammed the authors of the Riffle paper with this, no reply so far.
My guess is it is vulnerable to active timing attacks, they are so generic. Not sure at all jitter is solution.
-- You’re not from the Castle, you’re not from the village, you are nothing. Unfortunately, though, you are something, a stranger.
participants (9)
-
Bastiani Fortress -
Cari Machet -
Georgi Guninski -
grarpamp -
John -
juan -
Mirimir -
Peter Bourgelais -
stef