ZENDY seems remarkably well informed ( probably lives in the smartest place on whatever continent he's domiciled in ) But I'm curious what his friends at the Daily Stormer think. Do they all agree with you Zenaan? I've seen some oppose Israel and some support it, for example. Which camp are you in on that?
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:25:59PM +1000, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
This is the pragmatic approach which I prefer - and why I oppose BDS, since the remaining option is ongoing deep entanglement, which appears counter to our interests. There is some wisdom in "light" entanglement - but deep entanglement compromises both sides interests.
On 11/28/20 20:25, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
I disagree with all three of these. Religion and government should be separate, especially in the US where the Constitution specifically says so. In general theocracies are problematic for world peace (which I'd like to see happen in my lifetime). Of course, some corporations (military contractors) profit more off of war than peace... -- Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com
On 2020-11-29 18:47, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
The constitution is not being observed. The Holy Faith of Harvard rules, is converging the Christian Churches, and attempts to converge Muslims in Muslim lands, causing wars. Harvard was founded as the headquarters of the state Church of New England. In the war between the states, it became the state Church of America. The constitution proscribes a federal state Church, but allows the several states to have their several state Churches, an unstable arrangement which predictably failed to survive. State and Church always wind up in each other's arms. If you officially do not have a state religion, you have an unofficial state religion, which is considerably worse.
participants (4)
-
jamesd＠echeque.com -
professor rat -
Shawn K. Quinn -
Zenaan Harkness