I grouped you with others here with nyms like Batshit crazy Statsi, Gramps and Z. Harkness. Then you appeared to accept this grouping of mine as a ' community '. Then I misspelled " KAMARADEN " - my bad. Maybe " NAZI KUNTS " is easier for you. Also COINTELPRO by any other name applies when NAZI KUNTS like you and your little BUM BUDDY, Batshit Crazy NAZBOL, call fellow c-punks ' agents ' without providing one shred of evidence. Bad faith bearing of false-witness doesn't get much worse. You'll pay for that, I promise youse.
On 11/15/20, professor rat <pro2rat@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
I grouped you with others here with nyms like Batshit crazy Statsi, Gramps and Z. Harkness. <snip over multiple things indicating we've misled each other, snip contains the phrase 'fellow agent', some of which deserve a reply> evidence. Bad faith bearing of false-witness doesn't get much worse.
You'll pay for that, I promise youse.
By "double agent", I meant that while throwing shit everywhere, you are also communicating with us [and that this doesn't always end well]. We're already all calling each other out as disruptors etc. Would you be willing to keep to one thread more with me, for the rest of the list to manage their email better? Also: Community folks are looking for how to guide their communities so that they don't get fucked up. We do not accept being pawns in international games.
On 11/15/20, Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you be willing to keep to one thread more with me, for the rest of the list to manage their email better?
Sorry here. I'm still using gmail-cocaine, and it didn't group the mails into a thread, but I see they actually were. Might take me a bit to process that error.
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:40:12 +0000 (UTC) professor rat <pro2rat@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
call fellow c-punks ' agents ' without providing one shred of evidence.
you of course provided the evidence : 1) you used the 1000% statist term 'hate speech' to refer to common sense commentary on the fucking joos(marx included). And whined about 'antisemitism' (LMAO!!!) 2) you're pushing the highly idiotic 'narrative' according to which 'technology' will 'free' humanity. I think a honest cpunk would be WAY more careful with his opinions on the value of 'technology' (the sensible view is the exact opposite of Jim Bell's technofascit position). the rest of your posts are somewhat harder to clasify but they don't counter the stuff mentioned above. I'll give you some more rope though....
Bad faith bearing of false-witness doesn't get much worse.
You'll pay for that, I promise youse.
lawl
participants (3)
-
Karl
-
professor rat
-
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0