I am reminded of about 1992, when the 486 Intel microprocessor was discovered to have a rather serious flaw in its arithmetic unit, with potential errors in the 4th and even the 3rd digit.  Intel ended up replacing those CPU's.  I wonder if they will do the same thing this time.This particular article https://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/24/business/company-news-flaw-undermines-acc... mentions the Pentium and 1994, but I believe that the 486 had a similar problem.  But I am unable to find reference to it.   Also: https://www.cs.earlham.edu/~dusko/cs63/fdiv.html https://www.computerworld.com/article/2515483/epic-failures-11-infamous-soft... http://www.vcfed.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-17799.html               Jim Bell On Friday, March 6, 2020, 10:07:13 AM PST, jim bell wrote: The Verge: A major new Intel processor flaw could defeat encryption and DRM protections. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/6/21167782/intel-processor-flaw-root-of-trus...

On March 6, 2020 10:06:50 AM PST, jim bell wrote:

The Verge: A major new Intel processor flaw could defeat encryption and DRM protections. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/6/21167782/intel-processor-flaw-root-of-trus...

It was a floating point error in the math if I remember correctly. Something about the way it rounded off large numbers Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice Fuck you if you don't care for my 'brevity'.